Rodney M. Cate
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- Sally A. LloydJune M. HentonDavid W. JohnsonJames E. KovalSusan SprecherF. Scott ChristopherScott A. ChristopherTed L. Huston
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (23 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (10 papers)Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCameroon
In The Last Decade
Rodney M. Cate
45 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Social Psychology 997
- Sociology and Political Science 798
- Health 631
- Clinical Psychology 572
- Gender Studies 434
Countries citing papers authored by Rodney M. Cate
This map shows the geographic impact of Rodney M. Cate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rodney M. Cate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rodney M. Cate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rodney M. Cate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rodney M. Cate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rodney M. Cate. The network helps show where Rodney M. Cate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rodney M. Cate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rodney M. Cate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rodney M. Cate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rodney M. Cate. Rodney M. Cate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Have we met before?: A conceptual model of first romantic encounters. | 23 |
| 2 | 196 | |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | Conflict and violence in dating relationships. | 26 |
| 10 | The Relationship of Personal Attributes and Friendship Variables in Predicting Loneliness. | 11 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 63 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 287 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 285 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Rodney M. Cate
Rodney M. Cate is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health and Demography, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (23 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (10 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (631 citations), Social Psychology (997 citations) and Gender Studies (434 citations). Rodney M. Cate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Sally A. Lloyd, June M. Henton, David W. Johnson, James E. Koval, Susan Sprecher, F. Scott Christopher, Scott A. Christopher, Ted L. Huston, James J. Ponzetti and Edgar C. J. Long. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Sex Roles.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.