Rocío Martínez

3.7k total citations
23 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

Rocío Martínez is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Rocío Martínez has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Social Psychology, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Rocío Martínez's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers). Rocío Martínez is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers). Rocío Martínez collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Mexico and Italy. Rocío Martínez's co-authors include Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, Miguel Moya, Mario Sainz, Jeroen Vaes, Isaac M. Ortega, Martha Givaudan, Susan Pick, Robbie M. Sutton, Steve Loughnan and Paolo Cariati and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Rocío Martínez

22 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Rocío Martínez

SPS

GHP

Angela R. Robinson United States

Salvador Vargas Salfate Chile

Mario Sainz Spain

Alexandra Hantzi Greece

Anna Zlobina Spain

Verónica Betancor Spain

Roberta Rosa Valtorta Italy

MarYam G. Hamedani United States

Erin Cooley United States

Héctor Carvacho Chile

Angela R. Robinson United States

Rocío Martínez

135 ×0.8

146 ×0.9

SPS

56 ×0.9

24 ×0.7

GHP

23 ×0.8

Citations per year, relative to Rocío Martínez Rocío Martínez (= 1×) peers Angela R. Robinson

Countries citing papers authored by Rocío Martínez

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rocío Martínez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rocío Martínez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rocío Martínez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rocío Martínez

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rocío Martínez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rocío Martínez. The network helps show where Rocío Martínez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rocío Martínez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rocío Martínez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rocío Martínez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rocío Martínez. Rocío Martínez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

García‐Sánchez, Efraín, et al.. (2024). Development and validation of the Multidimensional Gender Inequality Perception Scale (MuGIPS). PLoS ONE. 19(4). e0301755–e0301755. 3 indexed citations

Delgado, Naira, et al.. (2023). How human are you? The humanness scale (¿Cuán humano eres tú? La escala de humanidad). International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social. 38(1). 122–156. 1 indexed citations

Martínez, Rocío. (2023). La escuela secundaria rionegrina en la transición democrática. 24(2). 1 indexed citations

Rodríguez‐Bailón, Rosa, et al.. (2023). Normative effect of economic inequality: empirical evidence about conspicuous consumption (Efecto normativo de la desigualdad económica: evidencias empíricas sobre el consumo conspicuo). International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social. 38(2). 412–455.

Giner‐Sorolla, Roger, et al.. (2023). Emotions as constituents, predictors and outcomes of dehumanization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 51. 101281–101281. 1 indexed citations

Rodríguez‐Bailón, Rosa, et al.. (2022). Economic Inequality Increases the Preference for Status Consumption. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 809101–809101. 23 indexed citations

Rodríguez‐Bailón, Rosa, et al.. (2022). Consumo estatutario y desigualdad económica. Universitas Psychologica. 20. 1–15. 1 indexed citations

Sainz, Mario, et al.. (2022). Perceived economic inequality enlarges the perceived humanity gap between low- and high-socioeconomic status groups. The Journal of Social Psychology. 164(5). 704–717. 4 indexed citations

Santos, David, Rocío Martínez, Pablo Briñol, & Richard E. Petty. (2022). Improving attitudes towards minority groups by thinking about the thoughts and meta‐cognitions of their members. European Journal of Social Psychology. 53(3). 552–566. 4 indexed citations

10.

Sainz, Mario, Rocío Martínez, Miguel Moya, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, & Jeroen Vaes. (2020). Lacking socio‐economic status reduces subjective well‐being through perceptions of meta‐dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology. 60(2). 470–489. 42 indexed citations

11.

Sainz, Mario, Steve Loughnan, Rocío Martínez, Miguel Moya, & Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón. (2020). Dehumanization of Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups Decreases Support for Welfare Policies via Perceived Wastefulness. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33(1). 12–12. 26 indexed citations

12.

Sainz, Mario, Rocío Martínez, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, & Miguel Moya. (2019). Where Does the Money Come From? Humanizing High Socioeconomic Status Groups Undermines Attitudes Toward Redistribution. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 771–771. 15 indexed citations

13.

Sainz, Mario, Rocío Martínez, Miguel Moya, & Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón. (2018). Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy: The convergence of socio‐economic status and attribution of humanity. International Journal of Psychology. 54(4). 423–430. 39 indexed citations

14.

Martínez, Rocío, Miguel Moya, & Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón. (2017). Humanos, animales y máquinas: entendiendo el proceso de deshumanización. Escritos de Psicología / Psychological Writings. 10(3). 178–189. 3 indexed citations

15.

Cariati, Paolo, et al.. (2016). Psycho-social impact of orthogathic sugery. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 8(5). 0–0. 6 indexed citations

16.

Martínez, Rocío, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, Miguel Moya, & Jeroen Vaes. (2015). Interacting with dehumanized others? Only if they are objectified. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 20(4). 465–482. 18 indexed citations

17.

Martínez, Rocío, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, & Miguel Moya. (2012). Are they Animals or Machines? Measuring Dehumanization. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 15(3). 1110–1122. 25 indexed citations

18.

Willis, Guillermo B., et al.. (2011). I Control therefore I am: Effects of Mortality Salience on Control Attributions. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 14(2). 765–772. 4 indexed citations

19.

Pick, Susan, et al.. (2007). Escala Para Medir Agencia Personal y Empoderamiento (ESAGE). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 43 indexed citations

20.

Martínez, Rocío, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, & Miguel Moya. (1969). ¿Por qué tienen éxito y fracasan las personas con poder y sin poder? poder y atribuciones de control. Universitas Psychologica. 9(1). 57–66. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact