Roberto Foa
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Health top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Co-authors
- Yascha MounkChristian WelzelChristopher PetersonRonald InglehartGrzegorz EkiertSam J. GilbertMark FabianЭдуард Понарин
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers)Social Capital and Networks (6 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomRussia
In The Last Decade
Roberto Foa
32 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 925
- Political Science and International Relations 652
- Social Psychology 562
- Health 238
- Communication 166
Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Foa
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Foa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Foa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Foa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Foa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Foa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Foa. The network helps show where Roberto Foa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberto Foa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberto Foa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberto Foa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roberto Foa. Roberto Foa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 53 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | The Weakness of Post-Communist Civil Society Reassessed. CES Papers - Open Forum #11, 2012 | 3 |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Can Differences In The Quality of Social Institutions and Social Capital Explain Cross-Country Environmental Performance? | 3 |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981–2007)breakdown → | 655 |
About Roberto Foa
Roberto Foa is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers), Social Capital and Networks (6 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (238 citations), Political Science and International Relations (652 citations) and Social Psychology (562 citations). Roberto Foa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Yascha Mounk, Christian Welzel, Christopher Peterson, Ronald Inglehart, Grzegorz Ekiert, Sam J. Gilbert, Mark Fabian, Ronald Inglehart, Эдуард Понарин and Arjan de Haan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, World Development and Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.