Robert Stanton

414 citations
24 papers · 244 indexed · h-index 9

Robert Stanton

20 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

Robert Stanton
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
  • Family Practice 14
  • Classics 20
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Education 85
Replace Martin Matthews with:
Martin Matthews United Kingdom
Jenny Moon United Kingdom
Margaret M. Hinrichs United States
Suzanne Schut Netherlands
Sebastian Merkel Germany
Maria Isabel Ribeiro Portugal
Yuwen Chang China
Greg Nash Australia
Holly Thompson United States
Deborah Barnett United Kingdom
Robert Stanton relative to Martin Matthews United Kingdom Martin Matthews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Martin Matthews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stanton. The network helps show where Robert Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stanton Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stanton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20201
2 201710
3 20170
4 201727
5 201725
6 201751
7 201614
8 20164
9
Could the Pharmaceutical Industry Benefit from Full-Scale Adoption of Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) Technology with New Regulations?
20164
10 20131
11 20102
12 20061
13 20022
14
The Culture of Translation in Anglo-Saxon England
200221
15
Coal bed sequestration of carbon dioxide
200121
16 199420
17 19881
18 19682
19 19610
20 19590

About Robert Stanton

Robert Stanton is a scholar working on Classics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Leadership and Management, Business and International Management and Family Practice, having authored 24 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (1 paper), Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (1 paper) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (31 citations), Family Practice (14 citations), Classics (20 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations) and Education (85 citations). Robert Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Glenn Anderson, Chris Gillette, Michael Rudolph, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Stephanie L. Anderson, H.J. Gluskoter, Peter D. Warwick, Gary D. Stricker, Romeo M. Flores and Craig Kimble. Their work appears in journals such as Bioresource Technology, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Translation and Literature and Western Historical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026