Robert Stanton

414 total citations
24 papers, 244 citations indexed

About

Robert Stanton is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Classics and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Stanton has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 244 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Classics and 4 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Robert Stanton's work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers). Robert Stanton is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers). Robert Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert Stanton's co-authors include H. Glenn Anderson, Chris Gillette, Michael Rudolph, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Stephanie L. Anderson, Romeo M. Flores, Peter D. Warwick, Gary D. Stricker, H.J. Gluskoter and Craig Kimble and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Bioresource Technology and American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

In The Last Decade

Robert Stanton

20 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Stanton United States 9 85 70 31 29 28 24 244
Jenny Moon United Kingdom 7 80 0.9× 21 0.3× 15 0.5× 12 0.4× 14 146
Greg Nash Australia 9 110 1.3× 35 0.5× 61 2.1× 2 0.1× 23 275
Martin Matthews United Kingdom 3 283 3.3× 207 3.0× 2 0.1× 44 1.5× 12 0.4× 6 355
Deborah Barnett United Kingdom 6 23 0.3× 10 0.1× 3 0.1× 29 1.0× 23 0.8× 8 90
Rhonda Magel United States 9 69 0.8× 100 1.4× 16 0.6× 37 1.3× 41 396
Suzanne Schut Netherlands 6 115 1.4× 224 3.2× 2 0.1× 41 1.4× 7 0.3× 6 275
Alan Wong Hong Kong 5 95 1.1× 94 1.3× 10 0.3× 48 1.7× 5 243
Margaret M. Hinrichs United States 7 18 0.2× 87 1.2× 2 0.1× 101 3.5× 8 0.3× 10 176
Margaret MacLeod United Kingdom 6 55 0.6× 43 0.6× 13 0.4× 2 0.1× 9 149
Holly Thompson United States 7 6 0.1× 26 0.4× 63 2.0× 27 0.9× 40 1.4× 14 267

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stanton. The network helps show where Robert Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Stanton. Robert Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stanton, Robert. (2020). "I am writing this to be as wrong as possible to you": Anne Carson’s Errancy. Open Collections. 28–43. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gillette, Chris, Robert Stanton, & H. Glenn Anderson. (2017). Student performance on a knowledge-based exam may predict student ability to communicate effectively with a standardized patient during an objective structured clinical examination. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 9(2). 201–207. 10 indexed citations
3.
Gillette, Chris, Robert Stanton, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Michael Rudolph, & H. Glenn Anderson. (2017). Cost-Effectiveness of Using Standardized Patients to Assess Student-Pharmacist Communication Skills. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 81(10). 6120–6120. 25 indexed citations
4.
Stanton, Robert, et al.. (2017). The Development of a Novel Interprofessional Education Curriculum for third year medical and pharmacy students. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1).
5.
Gillette, Chris, Michael Rudolph, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Robert Stanton, & H. Glenn Anderson. (2017). Improving Pharmacy Student Communication Outcomes Using Standardized Patients. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 81(6). 110–110. 27 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, H. Glenn, et al.. (2017). Comparison of Pharmaceutical Calculations Learning Outcomes Achieved Within a Traditional Lecture or Flipped Classroom Andragogy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 81(4). 70–70. 51 indexed citations
7.
Gillette, Chris, Michael Rudolph, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, et al.. (2016). Predictors of student performance on the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment at a new school of pharmacy using admissions and demographic data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 9(1). 84–89. 14 indexed citations
8.
Stanton, Robert, et al.. (2016). The opinion of preceptors and students of very early IPPE rotations delivered concurrently with didactic courses. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 9(1). 55–59. 4 indexed citations
9.
Coustasse, Alberto, et al.. (2016). Could the Pharmaceutical Industry Benefit from Full-Scale Adoption of Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) Technology with New Regulations?. PubMed. 13(Fall). 1b–1b. 4 indexed citations
10.
Stanton, Robert, et al.. (2013). Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Newly Recognized Clinical Entity. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 9(3). 129–135. 1 indexed citations
11.
Stanton, Robert. (2006). Linguistic Fragmentation and Redemption before King Alfred. The Yearbook of English Studies. 36(1). 12–26. 1 indexed citations
13.
Stanton, Robert. (2002). The Culture of Translation in Anglo-Saxon England. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 21 indexed citations
14.
Stanton, Robert, Romeo M. Flores, Peter D. Warwick, H.J. Gluskoter, & Gary D. Stricker. (2001). Coal bed sequestration of carbon dioxide. 21 indexed citations
15.
Stanton, Robert. (1997). Rhetoric and Translation in Ælfric's Prefaces. Translation and Literature. 6(2). 135–148. 1 indexed citations
16.
Stanton, Robert. (1994). An assessment of renewable energy for the UK. Bioresource Technology. 49(3). 281–284. 20 indexed citations
17.
Stanton, Robert, et al.. (1988). The Colorado River Survey: Robert B. Stanton and the Denver, Colorado Canyon & Pacific Railroad. Western Historical Quarterly. 19(3). 340–340. 1 indexed citations
18.
Stanton, Robert. (1968). The Plot-Tone Conflict: A New Key to the Novel. College English. 29(8). 602–602. 2 indexed citations
19.
Stanton, Robert. (1961). The Trial of Nature: An Analysis of The Blithedale Romance. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. 76(5). 528–538.
20.
Stanton, Robert. (1959). Typee and Milton: Paradise Well Lost. Modern Language Notes. 74(5). 407–407.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026