Robert S. Peirce

1.8k total citations
18 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Robert S. Peirce is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert S. Peirce has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Robert S. Peirce's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (4 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers). Robert S. Peirce is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (4 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers). Robert S. Peirce collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Robert S. Peirce's co-authors include Michael R. Frone, M. Lynne Cooper, Myra Cooper, Marcia Russell, Marcia M. Russell, Rebecca Farmer Huselid, Pamela Mudar, Dean G. Pruitt, Neil B. McGillicuddy and Gary L. Welton and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Psychology, Journal of Health and Social Behavior and Journal of Conflict Resolution.

In The Last Decade

Robert S. Peirce

18 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert S. Peirce United States 16 555 410 407 389 284 18 1.4k
Genevieve M. Ames United States 27 1.0k 1.8× 888 2.2× 457 1.1× 333 0.9× 248 0.9× 72 2.1k
John Petraitis United States 14 476 0.9× 551 1.3× 549 1.3× 332 0.9× 188 0.7× 19 1.8k
Celia C. Lo United States 26 685 1.2× 539 1.3× 745 1.8× 601 1.5× 288 1.0× 145 2.0k
Archie Brodsky United States 17 431 0.8× 245 0.6× 444 1.1× 267 0.7× 206 0.7× 41 1.3k
Stuart Usdan United States 21 424 0.8× 464 1.1× 368 0.9× 233 0.6× 136 0.5× 53 1.3k
Robert L. Flewelling United States 27 1.1k 2.0× 907 2.2× 691 1.7× 856 2.2× 222 0.8× 48 2.7k
Linda J. Roberts United States 23 535 1.0× 178 0.4× 400 1.0× 391 1.0× 531 1.9× 35 1.5k
Moira Plant United Kingdom 24 619 1.1× 736 1.8× 310 0.8× 326 0.8× 91 0.3× 63 1.4k
Mary Ellen O’Connell United States 17 732 1.3× 212 0.5× 1.1k 2.7× 246 0.6× 296 1.0× 39 2.4k
Barbara A. Moeykens United States 6 443 0.8× 571 1.4× 254 0.6× 152 0.4× 90 0.3× 7 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert S. Peirce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert S. Peirce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert S. Peirce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert S. Peirce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert S. Peirce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert S. Peirce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert S. Peirce. The network helps show where Robert S. Peirce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert S. Peirce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert S. Peirce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert S. Peirce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert S. Peirce. Robert S. Peirce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Russell, Marcia, et al.. (2001). NATURAL RECOVERY IN A COMMUNITY-BASED SAMPLE OF ALCOHOLICS: STUDY DESIGN AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA. Substance Use & Misuse. 36(11). 1417–1441. 41 indexed citations
2.
Peirce, Robert S., Michael R. Frone, Marcia Russell, Myra Cooper, & Pamela Mudar. (2000). A longitudinal model of social contact, social support, depression, and alcohol use.. Health Psychology. 19(1). 28–38. 201 indexed citations
3.
Peirce, Robert S., Michael R. Frone, Marcia M. Russell, M. Lynne Cooper, & Pamela Mudar. (2000). A longitudinal model of social contact, social support, depression, and alcohol use.. Health Psychology. 19(1). 28–38. 184 indexed citations
4.
Russell, Marcia, M. Lynne Cooper, Michael R. Frone, & Robert S. Peirce. (1999). A longitudinal study of stress, alcohol, and blood pressure in community-based samples of blacks and non-blacks.. PubMed. 23(4). 299–306. 19 indexed citations
5.
Russell, Marcia, Robert S. Peirce, Thomas H. Nochajski, et al.. (1998). Relations among alcohol consumption measures derived from the Cognitive Lifetime Drinking History. Drug and Alcohol Review. 17(4). 377–387. 17 indexed citations
6.
Cooper, Myra, Michael R. Frone, Marcia Russell, & Robert S. Peirce. (1997). Gender, stress, coping, and alcohol use.. 30 indexed citations
7.
Peirce, Robert S., Michael R. Frone, Marcia M. Russell, & Myra Cooper. (1996). Financial stress, social support, and alcohol involvement: A longitudinal test of the buffering hypothesis in a general population survey.. Health Psychology. 15(1). 38–47. 109 indexed citations
8.
Peirce, Robert S., Michael R. Frone, Marcia M. Russell, & Myra Cooper. (1996). Financial stress, social support, and alcohol involvement: A longitudinal test of the buffering hypothesis in a general population survey.. Health Psychology. 15(1). 38–47. 134 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, M. Lynne, Robert S. Peirce, & Marie‐Cecile O. Tidwell. (1995). Parental drinking problems and adolescent offspring substance use: Moderating effects of demographic and familial factors.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 9(1). 36–52. 2 indexed citations
10.
Cooper, M. Lynne, Robert S. Peirce, & Marie‐Cecile O. Tidwell. (1995). Parental drinking problems and adolescent offspring substance use: Moderating effects of demographic and familial factors.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 9(1). 36–52. 38 indexed citations
11.
Cooper, M. Lynne, Robert S. Peirce, & Rebecca Farmer Huselid. (1994). Substance use and sexual risk taking among Black adolescents and White adolescents.. Health Psychology. 13(3). 251–262. 150 indexed citations
12.
Peirce, Robert S., Michael R. Frone, Marcia Russell, & M. Lynne Cooper. (1994). Relationship of Financial Strain and Psychosocial Resources to Alcohol Use and Abuse: The Mediating Role of Negative Affect and Drinking Motives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 35(4). 291–291. 175 indexed citations
13.
Cooper, M. Lynne, Robert S. Peirce, & Rebecca Farmer Huselid. (1994). Substance use and sexual risk taking among Black adolescents and White adolescents.. Health Psychology. 13(3). 251–262. 113 indexed citations
14.
Pruitt, Dean G., et al.. (1993). Long-term success in mediation.. Law and Human Behavior. 17(3). 313–330. 80 indexed citations
15.
Peirce, Robert S. & Dean G. Pruitt. (1993). COMPLAINANT‐RESPONDENT DIFFERENCES IN PROCEDURAL CHOICE. International Journal of Conflict Management. 4(3). 199–222. 26 indexed citations
16.
Zubek, Josephine M., et al.. (1992). Disputant and Mediator Behaviors Affecting Short-Term Success in Mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 36(3). 546–572. 69 indexed citations
17.
Rice, Robert W., et al.. (1991). Using discrepancies to predict the perceived quality of work life. Journal of Business and Psychology. 6(1). 39–55. 7 indexed citations
18.
Pruitt, Dean G., et al.. (1990). GOAL ACHIEVEMENT, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND THE SUCCESS OF MEDIATION. International Journal of Conflict Management. 1(1). 33–45. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026