Robert R. Clewis
- Philosophy top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Alice ChiricoDavid B. YadenAndrea GaggioliAllen W. WoodG. Felicitas MunzelRobert B. LoudenImmanuel Kant
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers)Media Influence and Health (4 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
Robert R. Clewis
17 papers receiving 98 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Philosophy 39
- Social Psychology 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 26
- Sociology and Political Science 23
- Cognitive Neuroscience 18
Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. Clewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. Clewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. Clewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. Clewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. Clewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. Clewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. Clewis. The network helps show where Robert R. Clewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert R. Clewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert R. Clewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert R. Clewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert R. Clewis. Robert R. Clewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | The Sublime Reader | 2 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Kant’s Lectures on Philosophical Theology -- Training-Ground for the Moral Pedagogy of Religion? | 0 |
| 13 | “The Place of the Sublime in Kant’s Project” | 1 |
| 14 | Lectures on anthropology: the Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant | 1 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | Greenberg, Kant, and Aesthetic Judgments of Modernist Art | 2 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Robert R. Clewis
Robert R. Clewis is a scholar working on Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 21 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (10 citations). Robert R. Clewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alice Chirico, David B. Yaden, Andrea Gaggioli, Allen W. Wood, G. Felicitas Munzel, Robert B. Louden and Immanuel Kant. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Neuroethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.