Robert Neale

729 citations
25 papers · 599 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Neale

25 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

Robert Neale
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 348
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 147
  • Neurology 54
  • Molecular Biology 242
Replace R.A. O'Brien with:
R.A. O'Brien United States
Carole A. Wilmot United States
Helen Lamb United Kingdom
Hans R. Bürki Japan
P. Placheta Austria
Jens Aas Jansen Denmark
Stephen M. Sorensen United States
J.-J. Feldtrauer Switzerland
A. Theodorou United Kingdom
J.‐L. PEGLION France
Robert Neale relative to R.A. O'Brien United States R.A. O'Brien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R.A. O'Brien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Neale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Neale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Neale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Neale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Neale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Neale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Neale. The network helps show where Robert Neale may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Neale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Neale Line = papers co-authored together Robert Neale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200422
2
The unusual binding properties of the endothelin receptor antagonist CGS 27830 distinguishes receptor/agonist interactions.
19964
3 199317
4 199313
5 199219
6 19914
7 199114
8 198919
9 198916
10 19879
11 1987146
12 19866
13 198519
14 19835
15 198323
16 198217
17 19818
18 198043
19 197810
20 19592

About Robert Neale

Robert Neale is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (348 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (147 citations), Neurology (54 citations) and Molecular Biology (242 citations). Robert Neale has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George A. Stone, Jeffrey M. Liebman, C. Anthony Altar, Louis L. Martin, Michael Williams, Scott Fallon, Jan W. F. Wasley, Susan Gerhardt, Christopher M. Sinton and Bruce S. Glaeser. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Inflammation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026