Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Conductance fluctuations and chaotic scattering in ballistic microstructures
1992481 citationsC. M. Marcus, Robert M. Westervelt et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Single-Electron Charging in Double and Triple Quantum Dots with Tunable Coupling
1995389 citationsRobert M. Westervelt, A. C. Gossard et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Westervelt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Westervelt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Westervelt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Westervelt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Westervelt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Westervelt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Westervelt. The network helps show where Robert M. Westervelt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Westervelt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Westervelt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Westervelt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Westervelt. Robert M. Westervelt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lei, Ka‐Meng, Yi‐Qiao Song, Robert M. Westervelt, et al.. (2020). Portable NMR with Parallelism. Analytical Chemistry. 92(2). 2112–2120.30 indexed citations
3.
Berezovsky, Jesse & Robert M. Westervelt. (2010). Imaging Coherent Transport in Graphen (Part II): Probing Weak Localization. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).29 indexed citations
Xiang, Jie, Andy Vidan, M. Tinkham, Robert M. Westervelt, & Charles M. Lieber. (2006). Ge/Si nanowire mesoscopic Josephson junctions. Nature Nanotechnology. 1(3). 208–213.226 indexed citations
Fallahi, P., et al.. (2005). Imaging electrons in few-electron quantum dots. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2004.1 indexed citations
15.
Kerbage, C., et al.. (2005). Optical Detection and Magnetic Manipulation of Drops in Microfluidic Devices. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.3 indexed citations
Westervelt, Robert M.. (2003). Science of Nanoscale Systems and their Device Applications. APS March Meeting Abstracts. 2003.1 indexed citations
18.
Westervelt, Robert M.. (2000). Power Sources for Ultra Low Power Electronics. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
19.
Beck, R. G., M. A. Eriksson, Robert M. Westervelt, K. D. Maranowski, & A. C. Gossard. (1997). GaAs/AlGaAs self sensing cantilever for cryogenic scanning probe microscopy. APS March Meeting Abstracts.
20.
Marcus, C. M., et al.. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics of analog associative memories. Oxford University Press eBooks. 197–211.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.