Robert J. Smith

39 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Robert J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • General Psychology 13
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Social Psychology 95
  • Sociology and Political Science 163
  • Gender Studies 34
Replace Donald B. Meyer with:
Donald B. Meyer United States
Adam Phillips United Kingdom
Vasso Vassiliou United States
Aghop Der‐Karabetian United States
Jewel Spears Brooker United States
Yeh Hsueh United States
Robert C. Lane United States
Craig A. Wendorf United States
William McKinley Runyan United States
Hugh B. Urban United States
Robert J. Smith relative to Donald B. Meyer United States Donald B. Meyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Donald B. Meyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Smith. The network helps show where Robert J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Robert J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198928
2
The Impact of Implicit Racial Bias on the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion
201127
3 197527
4 197926
5 200120
6 198320
7 198319
8 197819
9 197817
10 196115
11 197814
12
Implicit White Favoritism in the Criminal Justice System
201513
13 198513
14 197812
15 198311
16 196010
17 19588
18 19678
19
The Geography of the Death Penalty and Its Ramifications
20117
20 19577

About Robert J. Smith

Robert J. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cultural Studies and General Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Social Representations and Identity (6 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (5 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (13 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Social Psychology (95 citations), Sociology and Political Science (163 citations) and Gender Studies (34 citations). Robert J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Eric S. Knowles, Justin D. Levinson, Martin F. Sherman, Mary B. Harris, Nancy Sherman, James Griffith, Michael G. Palfreyman, C.A. Marsden, Andrew J. Sleight and Robin Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Theory & Psychology, OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, The Journal of Social Psychology, American Anthropologist and American Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact