Robert J. Nash
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 0.1%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Biotechnology top 0.5%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
Papers in
-
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 120
- Biochemistry 16
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 15
- Co-authors
- George W. J. FleetNaoki AsanoRussell J. MolyneuxAtsushi KatoAlison A. WatsonLinda E. FellowsHaruhisa KizuIsao Adachi
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (26 papers)Phytochemistry (20 papers)Tetrahedron Asymmetry (20 papers)Tetrahedron (13 papers)Fitoterapia (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Robert J. Nash
235 papers receiving 8.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Organic Chemistry 5.9k
- Biotechnology 812
- Biochemistry 538
- Molecular Biology 4.8k
- Biochemistry 305
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Nash. The network helps show where Robert J. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert J. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 17 | Synthesis of hyacinthacine B₃ and purported hyacinthacine B₇ | 2010 | 3 |
| 18 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 19 | Nanotechnology Takes Roots | 2003 | 48 |
| 20 | The Hymenoptera Aculeata in the superfamilies Pompiloidea, Vespoidea, Sphecoidea and Apoidea of Murlough National Nature Reserve, Co Down | 1990 | 1 |
About Robert J. Nash
Robert J. Nash is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 239 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (120 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (50 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (22 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (20 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (20 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (15 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (14 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (5.9k citations), Biotechnology (812 citations), Biochemistry (538 citations), Molecular Biology (4.8k citations) and Biochemistry (305 citations). Robert J. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include George W. J. Fleet, Naoki Asano, Russell J. Molyneux, Atsushi Kato, Alison A. Watson, Linda E. Fellows, Haruhisa Kizu, Isao Adachi, Kyoko Ikeda and E.Arthur Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Phytochemistry, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, Tetrahedron and Fitoterapia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.