Robert H. Lieshout
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Law
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- European Union Policy and Governance (2 papers)Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper)Political Science Research and Education (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Robert H. Lieshout
10 papers receiving 45 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Political Science and International Relations 43
- Sociology and Political Science 15
- Strategy and Management 10
- Law 7
- Economics and Econometrics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Robert H. Lieshout
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert H. Lieshout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert H. Lieshout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert H. Lieshout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert H. Lieshout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert H. Lieshout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert H. Lieshout. The network helps show where Robert H. Lieshout may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert H. Lieshout
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert H. Lieshout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert H. Lieshout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert H. Lieshout. Robert H. Lieshout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effects of South Korean air carriers' network developments on route choice behaviour of travellers departing from Japan | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | De Gaulle, Moravcsik and the Choice for Europe. Soft Sources, Weak Evidence | 3 |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | The Struggle for the Organization of Europe: The Foundations of the European Union | 4 |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | A comparative study of German and French pivotal decision makers' preferences concerning the establishment of a European monetary union during the early 1970's and late 1980's | 2 |
| 9 | Between anarchy and hierarchy : a theory of international politics and foreign policy | 4 |
| 10 | Recensie van: 'H. Pellikaan, Anarchie, Staat en het Prisoner’s Dilemma: Eburon, Delft, 1994.’ | 1 |
| 11 | 0 |
About Robert H. Lieshout
Robert H. Lieshout is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 11 papers that have together received 60 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Union Policy and Governance (2 papers), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper) and Political Science Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (43 citations), Development (5 citations) and Public Administration (3 citations). Robert H. Lieshout has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bob Reinalda, Femke van Esch, Haruyoshi Matsumoto and Martin van Hees. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Politica, The Historical Journal and European Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.