Femke van Esch
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Finance top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Sebastiaan PrincenLudger HelmsEelke de JongBeverly CrawfordMark BoukesRobert H. LieshoutRens VliegenthartTjalling C. Koopmans
- Topics
- European Union Policy and Governance (13 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers)Cognitive Science and Mapping (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited Arab EmiratesRussia
In The Last Decade
Femke van Esch
23 papers receiving 246 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Political Science and International Relations 178
- Sociology and Political Science 58
- Strategy and Management 55
- Finance 39
- Economics and Econometrics 18
Countries citing papers authored by Femke van Esch
This map shows the geographic impact of Femke van Esch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Femke van Esch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Femke van Esch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Femke van Esch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Femke van Esch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Femke van Esch. The network helps show where Femke van Esch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Femke van Esch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Femke van Esch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Femke van Esch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Femke van Esch. Femke van Esch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | Cognitive Mapping Coding Manual: Deliverable 3.1 for the TRANSCRISIS Horizon2020 Project | 1 |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | Etatisme in de polder | 1 |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | A comparative study of German and French pivotal decision makers' preferences concerning the establishment of a European monetary union during the early 1970's and late 1980's | 2 |
About Femke van Esch
Femke van Esch is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Development, having authored 24 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Union Policy and Governance (13 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (178 citations), Finance (39 citations) and Strategy and Management (55 citations). Femke van Esch has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Arab Emirates and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Sebastiaan Princen, Ludger Helms, Eelke de Jong, Beverly Crawford, Mark Boukes, Robert H. Lieshout, Rens Vliegenthart and Tjalling C. Koopmans. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, Journal of European Public Policy and West European Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.