Robert Gulotty

25 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Robert Gulotty
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Catalysis 140
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Materials Chemistry 272
  • Development 20
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 48
Replace Yanwei Gu with:
Yanwei Gu China
Hosung Ki South Korea
Matthew R. Buck United States
Natalie A. Wasio United States
Benoît Cormary France
J. Vicat France
Gastón Corthey Argentina
R. Kumar United States
Lorenzo Poggini Italy
Ângelo Vargas Switzerland
Robert Gulotty relative to Yanwei Gu China Yanwei Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yanwei Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Gulotty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Gulotty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Gulotty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Gulotty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Gulotty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Gulotty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Gulotty. The network helps show where Robert Gulotty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Gulotty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Gulotty Line = papers co-authored together Robert Gulotty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001145
2 2005119
3 198559
4 198230
5 200226
6 200325
7 201424
8 198621
9 202119
10 202019
11 202015
12 201113
13 201713
14 202012
15 198312
16 200111
17 200110
18 20196
19 20196
20 20186

About Robert Gulotty

Robert Gulotty is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Biomedical Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Catalysis, having authored 25 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (7 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (5 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), World Trade Organization Law (4 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (4 papers) and Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (140 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations), Materials Chemistry (272 citations), Development (20 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (48 citations). Robert Gulotty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Abhaya K. Datye, Michael Smith, Judith Goldstein, Graham R. Fleming, Hugo Zea, J. Blackson, Yaming Jin, James R. Kastner, Jacob W. Petrich and Randall S. Alberte. Their work appears in journals such as International Organization, Energy & Fuels, World Trade Review, Economics and Politics and ChemCatChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact