World Trade Review

713 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 713 papers published in World Trade Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in World Trade Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (457 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (410 papers) and Strategy and Management (287 papers) specifically the topics of World Trade Organization Law (428 papers), Global trade and economics (406 papers) and International Arbitration and Investment Law (184 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Trade Review are Alan O. Sykes, Petros C. Mavroidis, Robert Wolfe, Chad P. Bown, Bernard Hoekman, Steve Charnovitz, Douglas A. Irwin, Gregory Shaffer, Daniel C. Esty and Kym Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in World Trade Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Trade Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Trade Review.

Countries where authors publish in World Trade Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Trade Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Trade Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Trade Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025