Robert G. Smits

1.0k citations
53 papers · 681 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Robert G. Smits

49 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Robert G. Smits
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Filtration and Separation 63
  • Mathematical Physics 168
  • Applied Mathematics 100
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 129
  • Finance 80
Replace J. L. Lebowitz with:
J. L. Lebowitz United States
Wilson Lamb United Kingdom
Sidney Golden United States
Michael Minkoff United States
Jan Naudts Belgium
Lloyd D. Fosdick United States
Marcus Benghi Pinto Brazil
G. Stephenson United Kingdom
Heide Narnhofer Austria
Muhammad Arshad China
Robert G. Smits relative to J. L. Lebowitz United States J. L. Lebowitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
J. L. Lebowitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Smits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Smits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Smits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Smits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Smits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Smits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Smits. The network helps show where Robert G. Smits may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Smits, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Smits Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Smits links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201490
2 199766
3 197750
4 197535
5 197133
6 199632
7 197432
8 197229
9 200128
10 200626
11 197623
12 197923
13 197622
14 197216
15 200516
16 197614
17 200412
18 200711
19 197611
20 197310

About Robert G. Smits

Robert G. Smits is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Biomedical Engineering, Mathematical Physics and Finance, having authored 53 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (12 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (8 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (7 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (5 papers) and Numerical methods in inverse problems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (63 citations), Mathematical Physics (168 citations), Applied Mathematics (100 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (129 citations) and Finance (80 citations). Robert G. Smits has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include D.L. Massart, Rodrigo Bañuelos, Tiziana Giorgi, Richard A. Muller, Jean Juillard, R. Dutch, Justin L. Payne, Martin Hand, William J. Collins and Jean‐Pierre Morel. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A, Electrochimica Acta, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry and Bernoulli.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact