Robert G. Harper

1.6k citations
44 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Robert G. Harper

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Robert G. Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 343
  • Transplantation 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
  • Clinical Psychology 233
  • Social Psychology 211
Replace Pio Enrico Ricci Bitti with:
Pio Enrico Ricci Bitti Italy
Fritz Renner Germany
Jörg Frommer Germany
Alan S. DeWolfe United States
Aurelio Prifitera United States
Walter Glannon Canada
Concetta De Pasquale Italy
Erich J. Greene United States
Virginia M. Rosen United States
James Giordano United States
Robert G. Harper relative to Pio Enrico Ricci Bitti Italy Pio Enrico Ricci Bitti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Pio Enrico Ricci Bitti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Harper. The network helps show where Robert G. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Harper Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201017
2 200490
3 20012
4 199845
5 199660
6 19943
7 199410
8 199329
9 19932
10 19927
11 19926
12 199115
13 199045
14 198821
15 19830
16 198018
17 197828
18
Nonverbal Communication: The State of the Art
1978209
19 19761
20 197547

About Robert G. Harper

Robert G. Harper is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Anatomy, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Clinical Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (2 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (343 citations), Transplantation (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (233 citations) and Social Psychology (211 citations). Robert G. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Arthur N. Wiens, Ranjit C. Chacko, Joseph D. Matarazzo, James Young, Rachelle S. Doody, Kathryn J. Kotrla, Francis J. Kane, Aaron T. Timperman, Jennifer N. Sutton and Satish G. Jhingran. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Neuropsychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026