Robert G. Angus

637 citations
14 papers · 411 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert G. Angus

14 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Robert G. Angus
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
  • Occupational Therapy 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 167
  • Social Psychology 152
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25
Replace Michael Russo with:
Michael Russo United States
W. Dean Chiles United States
Douglas R. Eddy United States
Christopher G. Mott United States
A. Samel Germany
Linda J. Connell United States
David Hallvig Sweden
Charles-Yannick Guézennec France
Kevin Kan United States
Ivan Lorenzo Mexico
Robert G. Angus relative to Michael Russo United States Michael Russo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Michael Russo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Angus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Angus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Angus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Angus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Angus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Angus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Angus. The network helps show where Robert G. Angus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Angus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Angus Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Angus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1985110
2 198563
3 198544
4 198038
5 199434
6 197734
7 199533
8 197413
9 197411
10 197811
11
Vigilance performance of men sleeping under arctic conditions.
197910
12 19788
13 19931
14
Eyepiece Setting for the L1A1 Weapon Sight.
19781

About Robert G. Angus

Robert G. Angus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (7 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (231 citations), Occupational Therapy (63 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (167 citations), Social Psychology (152 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (25 citations). Robert G. Angus has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Ronald J. Heslegrave, W. S. Myles, Ross Pigeau, Hiroshi Ono, Joseph V. Baranski, Peter Gregor, Alain Buguet, Pat O’Neill, Bernard Roussel and Marek W. Radomski. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Journal of Sleep Research, Psychophysiology, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact