Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Finn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Finn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Finn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Finn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Finn. The network helps show where Robert Finn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Finn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Finn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Finn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Finn. Robert Finn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pettit, Donald R., Mark Weislogel, Paul Concus, & Robert Finn. (2011). A Zero-Gravity Cup for Drinking Beverages in Microgravity. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
2.
Finn, Robert. (2007). The Floating Ball “Paradox”. Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics. 10(4). 583–587.2 indexed citations
3.
Concus, Paul, et al.. (1998). Liquid bridges, edge blobs, and Scherk-type surfaces. (Printed report title: A discontinuous dependence of liquid bridge configurations). eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
4.
Finn, Robert, et al.. (1996). The Modified Canonical Proboscis. Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen. 15(1). 95–108.1 indexed citations
Concus, Paul & Robert Finn. (1993). Capillary surfaces in a wedge: Differing contact angles. Microgravity Science and Technology. 7(2). 13244–155.15 indexed citations
7.
Concus, Paul & Robert Finn. (1990). Dichotomous behavior of capillary surfaces in zero gravity. Microgravity Science and Technology. 3(2). 87–92.29 indexed citations
8.
Finn, Robert. (1989). On the comparison principle for capillary surfaces. 36(1). 131–134.11 indexed citations
Finn, Robert. (1985). On the Pendant Liquid Drop. Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen. 4(4). 331–339.1 indexed citations
11.
Finn, Robert. (1984). A limiting geometry for capillary surfaces. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 11(3). 361–379.4 indexed citations
12.
Concus, Paul & Robert Finn. (1979). The shape of a pendant liquid drop. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 292(1391). 307–340.40 indexed citations
13.
Finn, Robert & Enrico Giusti. (1977). On nonparametric surfaces of constant mean curvature. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 4(1). 13–31.8 indexed citations
14.
Finn, Robert, et al.. (1975). Domesday Book: A Guide.. The Economic History Review. 28(1). 114–114.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.