Robert F. Port

4.0k citations
58 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 25

Robert F. Port

54 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Robert F. Port
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.9k
  • Linguistics and Language 996
  • Artificial Intelligence 954
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 603
  • Language and Linguistics 495
Replace Catherine P. Browman with:
Catherine P. Browman United States
Jonathan Harrington Germany
Cynthia G. Clopper United States
Holger Mitterer Netherlands
Michael D. Tyler Australia
Cynthia M. Connine United States
Allard Jongman United States
Joan A. Sereno United States
Paul Foulkes United Kingdom
David Pesetsky United States
Robert F. Port relative to Catherine P. Browman United States Catherine P. Browman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Catherine P. Browman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Port

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Port's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Port with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Port more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Port

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Port. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Port. The network helps show where Robert F. Port may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Port

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Port. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Port based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Port. Robert F. Port is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Rhythmical Factors in Stress Shift
0
2
Phones and phonemes are conceptual blends, not cognitive letters
2
3
Morphophonemics of Swahili verb suffixes
0
4
The applied suffix in Swahili
3
5 3
6 11
7 142
8 4
9 18
10
Beyond Symbolic: Prolegomena to a Kama-Sutra of Compositionality
1
11
Representing Aspects of Language
2
12 108
13 0
14 130
15 68
16 37
17 30
18 120
19 66
20 2

About Robert F. Port

Robert F. Port is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (42 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (17 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (996 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.9k citations) and Language and Linguistics (495 citations). Robert F. Port has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Dalby, Michael O’Dell, Fred Cummins, James Emil Flege, Hugo Quené, Keiichi Tajima, Marios Fourakis, Salman H. Al-Ani, Michael Ramscar and José Bravo. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026