Jonathan Dalby

949 total citations
20 papers, 607 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Dalby is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Dalby has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 607 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Dalby's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (17 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). Jonathan Dalby is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (17 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). Jonathan Dalby collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Jonathan Dalby's co-authors include Robert F. Port, Catherine L. Rogers, Michael O’Dell, Keiichi Tajima, Kanae Nishi, Diane Kewley-Port, James D. Miller, Charles S. Watson, Henry J. Thompson and M.A. Jack and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Journal of Phonetics.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Dalby

20 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Dalby United States 10 518 288 266 119 109 20 607
Elizabeth C. Zsiga United States 12 458 0.9× 208 0.7× 315 1.2× 62 0.5× 160 1.5× 23 532
Klaus J. Köhler Germany 12 470 0.9× 259 0.9× 253 1.0× 50 0.4× 168 1.5× 39 554
Rebecca M. Dauer United States 4 601 1.2× 251 0.9× 303 1.1× 186 1.6× 207 1.9× 7 756
Gösta Bruce United States 13 680 1.3× 408 1.4× 343 1.3× 91 0.8× 298 2.7× 63 832
Kimiko Tsukada Australia 12 492 0.9× 219 0.8× 315 1.2× 154 1.3× 125 1.1× 56 563
Constance M. Clarke United States 5 388 0.7× 86 0.3× 202 0.8× 110 0.9× 91 0.8× 9 467
Stephen J. Eady United States 6 562 1.1× 258 0.9× 219 0.8× 128 1.1× 185 1.7× 11 662
Caroline R. Wiltshire United States 10 563 1.1× 271 0.9× 397 1.5× 131 1.1× 261 2.4× 28 709
Olle Engstrand Sweden 11 365 0.7× 198 0.7× 196 0.7× 86 0.7× 91 0.8× 43 428
Ching X. Xu United States 3 342 0.7× 181 0.6× 170 0.6× 36 0.3× 107 1.0× 6 373

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Dalby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Dalby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Dalby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Dalby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Dalby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Dalby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Dalby. The network helps show where Jonathan Dalby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Dalby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Dalby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Dalby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Dalby. Jonathan Dalby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Dalby, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). STAR_PAK: A SIGNAL PROCESSING PACKAGE FOR ACOUSTIC-PHONETIC ANALYSIS OF SPEECH. 1 indexed citations
3.
Dalby, Jonathan & Catherine L. Rogers. (2009). Intelligibility of Spanish-accented English words in noise.. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 125(4_Supplement). 2776–2776. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dalby, Jonathan, et al.. (2007). Training segmental productions to improve second language intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 121(5_Supplement). 3072–3072. 1 indexed citations
5.
Dalby, Jonathan & Diane Kewley-Port. (2007). Design Features of Three Computer-Based Speech Training Systems. Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne). 2 indexed citations
6.
Rogers, Catherine L. & Jonathan Dalby. (2005). Forced-Choice Analysis of Segmental Production by Chinese-Accented English Speakers. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 48(2). 306–322. 20 indexed citations
7.
Rogers, Catherine L., Jonathan Dalby, & Kanae Nishi. (2004). Effects of Noise and Proficiency on Intelligibility of Chinese-Accented English. Language and Speech. 47(2). 139–154. 58 indexed citations
8.
Miller, James D., et al.. (2004). Training experienced hearing-aid users to identify syllable-initial consonants in quiet and noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 115(5_Supplement). 2387–2387. 8 indexed citations
9.
Kewley-Port, Diane, et al.. (2002). Speech intelligibility training using automatic speech recognition technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 112(5_Supplement). 2303–2304. 1 indexed citations
10.
Rogers, Catherine L., Jonathan Dalby, & Kanae Nishi. (2001). Effects of noise and proficiency level on intelligibility of Chinese-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 109(5_Supplement). 2473–2473. 14 indexed citations
11.
Dalby, Jonathan & Diane Kewley-Port. (1999). Explicit Pronunciation Training Using Automatic Speech Recognition Technology. CALICO Journal. 16(3). 425–445. 43 indexed citations
12.
Tajima, Keiichi, Robert F. Port, & Jonathan Dalby. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics. 25(1). 1–24. 117 indexed citations
13.
Tajima, Keiichi, Jonathan Dalby, & Robert F. Port. (1996). Foreign-accented rhythm and prosody in reiterant speech.. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 99(4_Supplement). 2493–2500. 5 indexed citations
14.
Rogers, Catherine L. & Jonathan Dalby. (1996). Prediction of foreign-accented speech intelligibility from segmental contrast measures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100(4_Supplement). 2725–2725. 9 indexed citations
15.
Rogers, Catherine L. & Jonathan Dalby. (1995). Intelligibility assessment of Chinese-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 98(5_Supplement). 2893–2893. 2 indexed citations
16.
Rogers, Catherine L., et al.. (1994). Intelligibility training for foreign-accented speech: A preliminary study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 96(5_Supplement). 3348–3348. 13 indexed citations
17.
Tajima, Keiichi, Robert F. Port, & Jonathan Dalby. (1994). Influence of timing on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 95(5_Supplement). 3009–3009. 6 indexed citations
18.
Port, Robert F., Jonathan Dalby, & Michael O’Dell. (1987). Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 81(5). 1574–1585. 130 indexed citations
19.
Dalby, Jonathan. (1984). Phonetic structure of fast speech in American english. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 50 indexed citations
20.
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics. 32(2). 141–152. 124 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026