Robert E. Sherman

3.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
31 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Robert E. Sherman is a scholar working on Surgery, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert E. Sherman has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Robert E. Sherman's work include Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers). Robert E. Sherman is often cited by papers focused on Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers). Robert E. Sherman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Robert E. Sherman's co-authors include Thomas J. Kiresuk, Ramon B. Gustilo, Denise F. Polit, Rolando M. Puno, Yoichiro Dohmae, David C. Anderson, Sandra E. Ford, Joan E. Bechtold, Thomas Bergman and Gaylan L. Rockswold and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Technometrics and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Robert E. Sherman

31 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating ... 1968 2026 1987 2006 1968 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert E. Sherman United States 18 612 473 381 285 251 31 2.6k
Marcus J. Führer United States 34 626 1.0× 1.1k 2.3× 250 0.7× 389 1.4× 489 1.9× 98 3.9k
William T. Carpenter United States 12 478 0.8× 877 1.9× 82 0.2× 128 0.4× 100 0.4× 14 1.9k
Art Noda United States 23 412 0.7× 446 0.9× 94 0.2× 185 0.6× 269 1.1× 60 2.4k
Joseph F. Lucke United States 31 266 0.4× 633 1.3× 405 1.1× 195 0.7× 344 1.4× 78 2.9k
Craig A. Velozo United States 38 304 0.5× 1.0k 2.2× 280 0.7× 347 1.2× 617 2.5× 133 3.8k
Mitchell Haas United States 32 444 0.7× 827 1.7× 466 1.2× 436 1.5× 96 0.4× 100 3.9k
Jane C. Johnson United States 35 363 0.6× 1.1k 2.3× 590 1.5× 427 1.5× 274 1.1× 106 3.9k
Farhad Shokraneh United Kingdom 22 364 0.6× 1.0k 2.1× 421 1.1× 120 0.4× 187 0.7× 99 2.7k
Anne G. Fisher United States 37 437 0.7× 1.7k 3.6× 198 0.5× 516 1.8× 373 1.5× 122 3.7k
Michael J. Lichtenstein United States 33 138 0.2× 744 1.6× 310 0.8× 407 1.4× 295 1.2× 105 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Sherman. The network helps show where Robert E. Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Sherman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Sherman. Robert E. Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bullock, Milton L., et al.. (2002). A large randomized placebo controlled study of auricular acupuncture for alcohol dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 22(2). 71–77. 75 indexed citations
2.
Kyle, Richard F., et al.. (1998). Forces Required to Initiate Sliding in Second-Generation Intramedullary Nails*. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 80(11). 1626–31. 63 indexed citations
3.
Rockswold, Gaylan L., Sandra E. Ford, David C. Anderson, Thomas Bergman, & Robert E. Sherman. (1992). Results of a prospective randomized trial for treatment of severely brain-injured patients with hyperbaric oxygen. Journal of neurosurgery. 76(6). 929–934. 124 indexed citations
4.
Sherman, Robert E., et al.. (1992). The case vignette method of suicide assessment.. 2 indexed citations
5.
Sherman, Robert E., et al.. (1990). Use of Case Vignettes in Suicide Risk Assessment. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 20(1). 65–84. 4 indexed citations
6.
Bechtold, Joan E., et al.. (1990). Stability of initial fixation of the tibial component in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 8(1). 64–71. 34 indexed citations
7.
Polit, Denise F. & Robert E. Sherman. (1990). Statistical Power In Nursing Research. Nursing Research. 39(6). 365???370–365???370. 98 indexed citations
8.
Ono, Makiko, et al.. (1989). Rotational Stability of Diaphyseal Fractures of the Radius and Ulna Fixed With Rush Pins and/or Fracture Bracing. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 240(240). 236–243. 26 indexed citations
9.
Dohmae, Yoichiro, et al.. (1988). Reduction in Cement-Bone Interface Shear Strength Between Primary and Revision Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 236(236). 214–220. 177 indexed citations
10.
Anderson, David C., et al.. (1987). Evoked Potentials to Test a Treatment of Chronic Multiple Sclerosis. Archives of Neurology. 44(12). 1232–1236. 33 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, David W., et al.. (1986). Extended High Frequency Hearing Sensitivity a Normative Threshold Study in Musicians. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 95(2). 196–202. 21 indexed citations
12.
Ruiz, Ernest, Douglas D. Brunette, Elaine P. Robinson, et al.. (1986). Cerebral resuscitation after cardiac arrest using hetastarch hemodilution, hyperbaric oxygenation and magnesium ion. Resuscitation. 14(4). 213–223. 12 indexed citations
13.
Slomovic, Allan R., Richard Parrish, & Robert E. Sherman. (1985). Corneal Endothelial Trauma after Descemet's Membranotomy with the Neodymium-YAG Laser. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 99(4). 484–485. 4 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, David W., et al.. (1985). Effects of Instrument Type and Orchestral Position on Hearing Sensitivity for 0.25 to 20 kHz in the Orchestral Musician. Scandinavian Audiology. 14(4). 215–221. 25 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, David W., Robert Hammond, & Robert E. Sherman. (1980). Hearing in an ambulance paramedic population. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 9(11). 557–561. 19 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, David W. & Robert E. Sherman. (1979). Normal Development and Ear Effect for Contralateral Acoustic Reflex in Children Six to Twelve Years Old. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 21(5). 572–581. 7 indexed citations
18.
Sherman, Robert E., et al.. (1977). Raman studies of hydrogen vibrational modes in palladium. Physics Letters A. 62(5). 353–355. 15 indexed citations
19.
Sherman, Robert E., et al.. (1971). Subungual osteochondroma: a case report. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 61(11). 434–436. 3 indexed citations
20.
Kiresuk, Thomas J. & Robert E. Sherman. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal. 4(6). 443–453. 1438 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026