Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs
- Journal
- Community Mental Health Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01530764 →Countries where authors are citing Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs
This map shows the geographic impact of Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs
This network shows the impact of Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs.
About Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs
This paper, published in 1968, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Thomas J. Kiresuk and Robert E. Sherman covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (572 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (418 citations) and General Health Professions (247 citations). Published in Community Mental Health Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01530764.