Robert D. Lee

52 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Robert D. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Public Administration 114
  • Plant Science 299
  • Management Information Systems 57
  • Political Science and International Relations 134
  • Economics and Econometrics 111
Replace W. P. Grant with:
W. P. Grant United Kingdom
Robert Shaffer United States
Tetty Havinga Netherlands
John Sargent Italy
Monica Schuster Belgium
Edmund W. Cheng Hong Kong
Lawrence S. Graham United States
Sukhpal Singh India
Ping Xu China
Bradley Wilson United States
Robert D. Lee relative to W. P. Grant United Kingdom W. P. Grant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.5×
W. P. Grant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Lee. The network helps show where Robert D. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert D. Lee Line = papers co-authored together Robert D. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014103
2 199084
3 201876
4 201662
5 201559
6 199730
7 200027
8 199122
9 201621
10 198516
11 199611
12 196910
13 195410
14
Performance Measurement in State Budgeting: Advancement and Backsliding from 1990 to 1995
20009
15 20189
16 19549
17 19839
18 19958
19 19928
20 20007

About Robert D. Lee

Robert D. Lee is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Plant Science, Public Administration, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (8 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (5 papers), Business Law and Ethics (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (3 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (114 citations), Plant Science (299 citations), Management Information Systems (57 citations), Political Science and International Relations (134 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (111 citations). Robert D. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and India. Frequent co-authors include Baozhu Guo, Jake C. Fountain, Robert C. Kemerait, Ronald W. Johnson, Philip G. Joyce, Xinzhi Ni, Brian T. Scully, Liming Yang, Robert C. Burns and Paul S. Greenlaw. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Journal of Economic Entomology, The Crop Journal and Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact