Philip G. Joyce
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Public Administration top 1%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Daniel R. MullinsAmy K. DonahueRobert D. LeeRonald W. JohnsonAlfred Tat‐Kei HoGiuseppe GrossiScott PattisonMeagan M. Jordan
- Topics
- Local Government Finance and Decentralization (12 papers)Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (11 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers)
- Cited by
- Public AdministrationPolitical Science and International RelationsEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenItaly
In The Last Decade
Philip G. Joyce
24 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Economics and Econometrics 402
- Political Science and International Relations 376
- Public Administration 239
- Management Information Systems 126
- Sociology and Political Science 103
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Joyce
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Joyce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Joyce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Joyce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Joyce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Joyce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Joyce. The network helps show where Philip G. Joyce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Joyce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Joyce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Joyce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Joyce. Philip G. Joyce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 79 | |
| 11 | 72 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 84 |
About Philip G. Joyce
Philip G. Joyce is a scholar working on Public Administration, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 26 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (12 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (11 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (239 citations), Political Science and International Relations (376 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (402 citations). Philip G. Joyce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Daniel R. Mullins, Amy K. Donahue, Robert D. Lee, Ronald W. Johnson, Alfred Tat‐Kei Ho, Giuseppe Grossi, Scott Pattison, Meagan M. Jordan, Robert D. Reischauer and Thomas Ahrens. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management and Public Administration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.