Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Improving the Density of Jammed Disordered Packings Using Ellipsoids
2004997 citationsAleksandar Donev, Frank H. Stillinger et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Connelly
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Connelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Connelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Connelly more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Connelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Connelly. The network helps show where Robert Connelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Connelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Connelly.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Connelly based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Connelly. Robert Connelly is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Connelly, Robert, Tibor Jordán, & Walter Whiteley. (2013). Generic global rigidity of body–bar frameworks. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B. 103(6). 689–705.26 indexed citations
4.
Connelly, Robert, et al.. (2013). Periodic planar disc packings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 372(2008). 20120039–20120039.13 indexed citations
Zhang, Jingyao, Simon D. Guest, Robert Connelly, & Makoto Ohsaki. (2009). Dihedral ‘star’ tensegrity structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 47(1). 1–9.35 indexed citations
Connelly, Robert. (2008). Rigidity of packings. European Journal of Combinatorics. 29(8). 1862–1871.13 indexed citations
10.
Connelly, Robert, Patrick W. Fowler, Simon D. Guest, Bernd Schulze, & Walter Whiteley. (2008). When is a symmetric pin-jointed framework isostatic?. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 46(3-4). 762–773.49 indexed citations
Bezdek, Károly, et al.. (2006). On the Perimeter of the Intersection of Congruent Disks.4 indexed citations
13.
Connelly, Robert, Erik D. Demaine, & Günter Rote. (2000). Every Polygon Can Be Untangled.. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 83. 62–65.5 indexed citations
14.
Connelly, Robert, et al.. (1997). The Bellows conjecture.. 38(1). 1–10.54 indexed citations
15.
Ostro, S. J. & Robert Connelly. (1986). What can a Lightcurve Tell us about an Asteroid's Shape?. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 636–637.1 indexed citations
16.
Connelly, Robert & S. J. Ostro. (1985). Convex-profile inversion of asteroid lightcurves.. 4041. 60–62.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.