Robert Cockcroft
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Mechanics of Materials
- Co-authors
- Craig HamiltonLaura Hidalgo DowningWilliam E. HarrisJeremy BailinEric W. PengJohn P. BlakesleeBradley C. WhitmoreOleg Y. Gnedin
- Topics
- Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (2 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Robert Cockcroft
12 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 71
- Literature and Literary Theory 37
- Instrumentation 33
- Mechanical Engineering 29
- Mechanics of Materials 24
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Cockcroft
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Cockcroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Cockcroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Cockcroft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Cockcroft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Cockcroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Cockcroft. The network helps show where Robert Cockcroft may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Cockcroft
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Cockcroft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Cockcroft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Cockcroft. Robert Cockcroft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Persuading people an introduction to rhetoric | 29 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Fine-tuning Quintilian's doctrine of rhetorical emotion: seven types of enargeia | 0 |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 31 |
About Robert Cockcroft
Robert Cockcroft is a scholar working on Classics, Instrumentation and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 15 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (2 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (33 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (71 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (37 citations). Robert Cockcroft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig Hamilton, Laura Hidalgo Downing, William E. Harris, Jeremy Bailin, Eric W. Peng, John P. Blakeslee, Bradley C. Whitmore, Oleg Y. Gnedin, Warren R. Morningstar and Barry Rothberg. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.