Robert Chazan
Impact in
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 26
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 17
- Archeology 27
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 26
- Co-authors
- Michael W. Rubinoff (1 shared paper)Joseph R. Strayer (1 shared paper)Andrew Colin Gow (1 shared paper)Gavin I. Langmuir (1 shared paper)Marc Saperstein (1 shared paper)Jérémy Cohen (1 shared paper)Ronald Freedman (1 shared paper)Albert S. Lindemann (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (7 papers)Revue des Études Juives (4 papers)Speculum (4 papers)The Jewish Quarterly Review (4 papers)Harvard Theological Review (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandFrance
In The Last Decade
Robert Chazan
52 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Classics 63
- Religious studies 60
- Philosophy 127
- History 110
- Archeology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Chazan
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Chazan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Chazan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Chazan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Chazan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Chazan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Chazan. The network helps show where Robert Chazan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Robert Chazan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 33 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 15 | In the Year 1096: The First Crusade and the Jews | 1996 | 7 |
| 16 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1973 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 5 |
About Robert Chazan
Robert Chazan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, History, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 59 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (26 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (26 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (17 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (16 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (10 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (10 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (7 papers) and Jewish Identity and Society (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (63 citations), Religious studies (60 citations), Philosophy (127 citations), History (110 citations) and Archeology (92 citations). Robert Chazan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Rubinoff, Joseph R. Strayer, Andrew Colin Gow, Gavin I. Langmuir, Marc Saperstein, Jérémy Cohen, Ronald Freedman, Jérémy Cohen and Albert S. Lindemann. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Revue des Études Juives, Speculum, The Jewish Quarterly Review and Harvard Theological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.