Robert C. Bilger

1.4k total citations
56 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Robert C. Bilger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert C. Bilger has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Signal Processing and 15 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Robert C. Bilger's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (30 papers), Noise Effects and Management (15 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers). Robert C. Bilger is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (30 papers), Noise Effects and Management (15 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers). Robert C. Bilger collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert C. Bilger's co-authors include Marilyn D. Wang, Walt Jesteadt, Charissa R. Lansing, Melanie L. Matthies, Marilyn E. Demorest, Charlotte M. Reed, Bruce C. Wheeler, Albert S. Feng, William D. O’Brien and Chen Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Robert C. Bilger

50 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert C. Bilger United States 13 700 419 286 279 242 56 1.0k
W. M. Rabinowitz United States 17 1.2k 1.7× 503 1.2× 289 1.0× 340 1.2× 441 1.8× 35 1.5k
Pierre L. Divenyi United States 16 859 1.2× 386 0.9× 200 0.7× 327 1.2× 288 1.2× 48 1.0k
Rhona P. Hellman United States 20 977 1.4× 215 0.5× 288 1.0× 326 1.2× 510 2.1× 39 1.4k
Chaslav V. Pavlovic United States 13 795 1.1× 514 1.2× 248 0.9× 102 0.4× 459 1.9× 28 897
Charissa R. Lansing United States 17 832 1.2× 443 1.1× 217 0.8× 277 1.0× 269 1.1× 35 1.2k
Jean Sullivan United States 6 1.6k 2.3× 771 1.8× 585 2.0× 234 0.8× 941 3.9× 12 1.8k
Dianne J. Van Tasell United States 19 1.1k 1.6× 603 1.4× 401 1.4× 175 0.6× 607 2.5× 41 1.2k
B. C. J. Moore United Kingdom 12 888 1.3× 307 0.7× 507 1.8× 72 0.3× 513 2.1× 24 981
Tomasz Łętowski United States 18 934 1.3× 461 1.1× 222 0.8× 218 0.8× 507 2.1× 82 1.2k
Arlene C. Neuman United States 19 1.1k 1.5× 476 1.1× 355 1.2× 98 0.4× 653 2.7× 44 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Bilger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Bilger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Bilger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Bilger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Bilger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Bilger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Bilger. The network helps show where Robert C. Bilger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Bilger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Bilger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Bilger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Bilger. Robert C. Bilger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lockwood, Michael E., Douglas L. Jones, Robert C. Bilger, et al.. (2003). Performance of time- and frequency-domain binaural beamformers based on recorded signals from real rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 115(1). 379–391. 43 indexed citations
2.
Proctor, Adele, et al.. (2002). Digit Speech Recognition Thresholds (SRT) for Non-Native Speakers of English. American Journal of Audiology. 11(1). 23–28. 55 indexed citations
3.
Lockwood, Michael E., Charissa R. Lansing, Robert C. Bilger, et al.. (2001). Human performance in a multisource environment with a frequency-banded minimum-variance beamforming algorithm. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 109(5_Supplement). 2494–2494. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lockwood, Michael E., Robert C. Bilger, M. Goueygou, et al.. (1999). A real-time dual-microphone signal-processing system for hearing aids. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 106(4_Supplement). 2279–2279.
5.
Bilger, Robert C., Melanie L. Matthies, Ted A. Meyer, & Scott Griffiths. (1998). Psychometric Equivalence of Recorded Spondaic Words as Test Items. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 41(3). 516–526. 5 indexed citations
6.
Meyer, Ted A. & Robert C. Bilger. (1997). Effect of Set Size and Method on Speech Reception Thresholds in Noise. Ear and Hearing. 18(3). 202–209. 9 indexed citations
7.
Bilger, Robert C., et al.. (1991). Spectral instabilities of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90(4_Supplement). 2289–2289. 3 indexed citations
8.
Griffiths, Scott, Ron D. Chambers, & Robert C. Bilger. (1989). Statistical Dependence among the Wave Latencies of the Auditory Brain Stem Response. Ear and Hearing. 10(5). 299–303. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bilger, Robert C.. (1983). AUDITORY RESULTS WITH SINGLE‐CHANNEL IMPLANTSa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 405(1). 337–342. 3 indexed citations
10.
Bilger, Robert C.. (1981). Psychological Acoustics.. Ear and Hearing. 2(1). 52–53. 1 indexed citations
11.
Jesteadt, Walt, Robert C. Bilger, David M. Green, & J. Herbert Patterson. (1976). Temporal Acuity in Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 19(2). 357–370. 19 indexed citations
12.
Nelson, David A. & Robert C. Bilger. (1974). Pure-Tone Octave Masking in Normal-Hearing Listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 17(2). 223–251. 6 indexed citations
13.
Reed, Charlotte M. & Robert C. Bilger. (1973). A comparative study of S/N and E/N. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 53(4). 1039–1044. 21 indexed citations
14.
Bilger, Robert C.. (1966). Errata: Remote Masking in the Absence of Intra-aural Muscles [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39, 103–108 (1066)]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 39(5A). 978–978.
15.
Bilger, Robert C.. (1965). SOME PARAMETERS OF FIXED-FREQUENCY BEKESY AUDIOMETRY.. PubMed. 8. 85–95. 5 indexed citations
16.
Bilger, Robert C., et al.. (1964). Temporal Integration as a Function of Frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 36(10). 1850–1857. 12 indexed citations
17.
Bilger, Robert C., et al.. (1960). Hearing Aid Evaluation: Reliability of Repeated Measurements. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 25(2). 152–170. 35 indexed citations
18.
Sherrick, Carl E. & Robert C. Bilger. (1959). Auditory Sensitivity of the Guinea Pig to Low-Frequency Tones. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 9(3). 339–344. 3 indexed citations
19.
Bilger, Robert C., et al.. (1959). Electrophysiologic Responses to Sound as a Function of Intensity, EEG Pattern and Sex. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 2(1). 28–39. 2 indexed citations
20.
Bilger, Robert C.. (1954). A COMPARISON OF MONAURAL AND BINAURAL LISTENING IN THREE LEVELS OF AMBIENT NOISE. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026