Robert C. Bilger

50 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

Robert C. Bilger
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Sensory Systems 252
  • Signal Processing 385
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 654
  • Speech and Hearing 208
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 244
Replace W. M. Rabinowitz with:
W. M. Rabinowitz United States
Sharon M. Abel Canada
R. J. Ritsma Netherlands
Earl D. Schubert United States
Ernst Terhardt Germany
Rosalie M. Uchanski United States
Robert S. Schlauch United States
J. M. Pickett United States
Adrian Fourcin United Kingdom
Mariano A. Fernandes United Kingdom
Robert C. Bilger relative to W. M. Rabinowitz United States W. M. Rabinowitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. M. Rabinowitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Bilger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Bilger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Bilger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Bilger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Bilger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Bilger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Bilger. The network helps show where Robert C. Bilger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Bilger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Bilger Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Bilger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973281
2 1990125
3 197679
4 197465
5 200062
6 200256
7 200343
8 197839
9 196035
10 200126
11 197321
12 197619
13 196216
14 196412
15 196112
16 198911
17 196510
18 19979
19 19588
20 19668

About Robert C. Bilger

Robert C. Bilger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Speech and Hearing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (30 papers), Noise Effects and Management (14 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (8 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers) and Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (252 citations), Signal Processing (385 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (654 citations), Speech and Hearing (208 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (244 citations). Robert C. Bilger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn D. Wang, Walt Jesteadt, Charissa R. Lansing, Melanie L. Matthies, Marilyn E. Demorest, Charlotte M. Reed, Albert S. Feng, Bruce C. Wheeler, William D. O’Brien and Chen Liu. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Ear and Hearing, The Laryngoscope and Behavior Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact