William Melnick

33 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

William Melnick
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Sensory Systems 359
  • Speech and Hearing 378
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 491
  • Otorhinolaryngology 61
  • Equine 18
Replace Kathryn A. Beauchaine with:
Kathryn A. Beauchaine United States
Don W. Worthington United States
E. Borg Sweden
M. P. Brocaar Netherlands
Geary A. McCandless United States
Kenneth J. Gerhardt United States
Sandra C. Champagne Canada
G. Salomon Denmark
Hasso von Wedel Germany
Tokuro Suzuki Japan
William Melnick relative to Kathryn A. Beauchaine United States Kathryn A. Beauchaine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kathryn A. Beauchaine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Melnick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Melnick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Melnick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Melnick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Melnick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Melnick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Melnick. The network helps show where William Melnick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside William Melnick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Melnick Line = papers co-authored together William Melnick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
American National Standard specifications for audiometers.
1971317
2 1971141
3 1991102
4 198145
5 196430
6
Auditory brain stem response testing in anesthetized horses.
198718
7 198315
8 198414
9 198713
10 197411
11 197011
12 196510
13 197410
14 197710
15 19729
16 19919
17 19798
18 19848
19 19678
20 19806

About William Melnick

William Melnick is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Automotive Engineering and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (19 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (5 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (3 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers) and Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (359 citations), Speech and Hearing (378 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (491 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (61 citations) and Equine (18 citations). William Melnick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Lim, Herbert S. Levine, Robert A. Hendrix, Robert C. Bilger, John A. Ferraro, Kenneth J. Gerhardt, Michael D. Maves, William Morgan, Stephen M. Reed and Frank M. Andrews. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, Ear and Hearing, American Journal of Otolaryngology and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact