Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Robert B. Fetter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert B. Fetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert B. Fetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert B. Fetter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert B. Fetter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert B. Fetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert B. Fetter. The network helps show where Robert B. Fetter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert B. Fetter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert B. Fetter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert B. Fetter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert B. Fetter. Robert B. Fetter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fetter, Robert B., et al.. (1991). DRGs : their design and development.104 indexed citations
4.
Fetter, Robert B.. (1989). Conceptos de dirección de Case-Mix. Todo hospital. 43–50.1 indexed citations
5.
Murtaugh, Christopher M., et al.. (1988). Nursing home reimbursement and the allocation of rehabilitation therapy resources.. PubMed. 23(4). 467–93.23 indexed citations
6.
Schneider, Karen, Jean L. Freeman, Robert C. Newbold, et al.. (1988). Ambulatory visit groups. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management. 11(3). 1–1.18 indexed citations
7.
Fetter, Robert B., et al.. (1985). DRGs: how they evolved and are changing the way hospitals are managed.. PubMed. 39(6). 17–21.15 indexed citations
8.
Fetter, Robert B., et al.. (1984). Ambulatory visit groups: a framework for measuring productivity in ambulatory care.. PubMed. 19(4). 415–37.33 indexed citations
9.
Smits, Helen L., Robert B. Fetter, & Laurence F. McMahon. (1984). Variation in resource use within diagnosis-related groups: the severity issue.. PubMed. Suppl. 71–8.32 indexed citations
Fetter, Robert B., et al.. (1975). Case mix and resource use.. PubMed. 12(4). 300–12.46 indexed citations
14.
Fetter, Robert B.. (1967). The quality control system.12 indexed citations
15.
Bowman, Edward H. & Robert B. Fetter. (1967). Analysis for production and operations management.23 indexed citations
16.
Thompson, John D. & Robert B. Fetter. (1963). THE ECONOMICS OF THE MATERNITY SERVICE.. PubMed. 36. 91–103.16 indexed citations
17.
Tolley, George S., Charles C. Holt, Franco Modigliani, et al.. (1962). Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force. Journal of Farm Economics. 44(2). 650–650.264 indexed citations breakdown →
Fetter, Robert B. & Donald C. Johnson. (1952). Compensation and incentives for industrial executives. Indiana University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.