Rob Scholten

14.3k citations
100 papers · 9.4k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 45

Rob Scholten

99 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Hit Papers

Music-based therapeutic intervention...296200520262012201950010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

Rob Scholten
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
  • Pharmacology 1.4k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 510
  • Surgery 3.0k
  • Health Informatics 87
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.4k
Replace Caroline J Doré with:
Caroline J Doré United Kingdom
Xiaohui Gong China
Yizhong Wang China
Elda Dermyshi United Kingdom
Chongbing Yan China
Wenchao Hong China
Javier Zamora Spain
Anne WS Rutjes Switzerland
Kristian Thorlund Canada
Jeroen G. Lijmer Netherlands
Rob Scholten relative to Caroline J Doré United Kingdom Caroline J Doré's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Caroline J Doré · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Scholten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Scholten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Scholten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Scholten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Scholten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Scholten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Scholten. The network helps show where Rob Scholten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rob Scholten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rob Scholten Line = papers co-authored together Rob Scholten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202224
2 202154
3 202014
4 20201
5 20206
6 201918
7 201973
8 201514
9 20149
10 20131
11 201220
12 201139
13 2008274
14 2008241
15 2006115
16 200563
17 2005302
18
Epidural steroid injections for low back pain and sciatica: an updated systemtic review of randomized clinical trials
199953
19 1999123
20 1995329

About Rob Scholten

Rob Scholten is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Family Practice, Statistics and Probability, Pharmacology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 9.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (20 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (16 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (11 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (8 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (7 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.4k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (510 citations), Surgery (3.0k citations), Health Informatics (87 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.4k citations). Rob Scholten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johannes B. Reitsma, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Anne WS Rutjes, Afina S. Glas, L.M. Bouter, Lotty Hooft, Bart W. Koes, Henrica C. W. de Vet and Mariska Leeflang. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, PLoS ONE, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026