Ritu Das

925 citations
24 papers · 688 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ritu Das

24 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

Ritu Das
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Biomedical Engineering 333
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Molecular Biology 362
  • Electrochemistry 32
  • Biomaterials 63
Replace Ignatius Julian Dinshaw with:
Ignatius Julian Dinshaw Malaysia
Yahya Sefidbakht Iran
Hamid Kooshki Iran
Özgecan Erdem Türkiye
Guanghong Zeng Denmark
Abu Hashem Bangladesh
Jamal Rashidiani Iran
Tohid Mahmoudi Iran
Jinhui Cui China
Noor Akbar United Arab Emirates
Ritu Das relative to Ignatius Julian Dinshaw Malaysia Ignatius Julian Dinshaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ignatius Julian Dinshaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ritu Das

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ritu Das's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ritu Das with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ritu Das more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ritu Das

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ritu Das. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ritu Das. The network helps show where Ritu Das may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ritu Das, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ritu Das Line = papers co-authored together Ritu Das links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019197
2 2018128
3 202355
4 201851
5 201450
6 201948
7 201529
8 201927
9 202421
10 202112
11 201910
12 201810
13 201910
14 20219
15 20206
16 20156
17 20185
18 20244
19 20252
20 20252

About Ritu Das

Ritu Das is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (6 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (5 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (4 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (2 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (333 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Molecular Biology (362 citations), Electrochemistry (32 citations) and Biomaterials (63 citations). Ritu Das has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Tarun Kumar Sharma, Arti Kapil, Abhijeet Dhiman, Vipul Bansal, Mukesh K. Agarwal, Megha Agarwal, Sanjay Upadhyay, Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Levent Beker and Muhammad Awais. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials Technologies, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Scientific Reports and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact