Rita M. Fishpool

505 total citations
9 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

Rita M. Fishpool is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aging and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rita M. Fishpool has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Aging and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Rita M. Fishpool's work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers). Rita M. Fishpool is often cited by papers focused on Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers). Rita M. Fishpool collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Russia. Rita M. Fishpool's co-authors include R Waterston, Sydney Brenner, Donna G. Albertson, Alexander R. MacLeod, E Nacheva, César Milstein, Paul D. Sherrington, Eileen Southgate, J P Walrond and Ira S. Kass and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Genetics and The EMBO Journal.

In The Last Decade

Rita M. Fishpool

9 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rita M. Fishpool United Kingdom	7	235	228	63	56	56	9	426
Bonnie Saari United States	8	641 2.7×	288 1.3×	61 1.0×	30 0.5×	18 0.3×	9	758
Rock Pulak United States	6	671 2.9×	313 1.4×	51 0.8×	24 0.4×	18 0.3×	9	851
Florian Aeschimann Switzerland	13	738 3.1×	206 0.9×	53 0.8×	22 0.4×	51 0.9×	17	907
Ouarda Taghli-Lamallem United States	10	262 1.1×	66 0.3×	52 0.8×	107 1.9×	32 0.6×	15	408
Brian M. Farley United States	11	399 1.7×	200 0.9×	44 0.7×	9 0.2×	20 0.4×	12	491
Christopher M. Hammell United States	15	932 4.0×	368 1.6×	47 0.7×	13 0.2×	35 0.6×	26	1.1k
Peter J. Schweinsberg United States	9	368 1.6×	303 1.3×	39 0.6×	7 0.1×	38 0.7×	9	641
Joshua A. Arribere United States	12	989 4.2×	428 1.9×	119 1.9×	29 0.5×	20 0.4×	20	1.2k
Julie Ni United States	10	680 2.9×	233 1.0×	60 1.0×	10 0.2×	23 0.4×	14	787
J. James Donady United States	10	403 1.7×	53 0.2×	80 1.3×	139 2.5×	61 1.1×	16	529

Countries citing papers authored by Rita M. Fishpool

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita M. Fishpool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita M. Fishpool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita M. Fishpool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita M. Fishpool

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita M. Fishpool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita M. Fishpool. The network helps show where Rita M. Fishpool may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita M. Fishpool

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita M. Fishpool. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita M. Fishpool based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rita M. Fishpool. Rita M. Fishpool is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Fishpool, Rita M., et al.. (1995). Expression patterns of predicted genes from the C. elegans genome sequence visualized by FISH in whole organisms. Nature Genetics. 11(3). 314–320. 18 indexed citations

2.

Albertson, Donna G., et al.. (1995). Chapter 15 Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization for the Detection of DNA and RNA. Methods in cell biology. 48. 339–364. 40 indexed citations

3.

Albertson, Donna G., et al.. (1995). Fluorescent in situ hybridization for the detection of DNA and RNA. 339–364. 2 indexed citations

4.

Heppell-Parton, Amanda, Donna G. Albertson, Rita M. Fishpool, & Pamela Rabbitts. (1994). Multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridisation to order small, single-copy probes on metaphase chromosomes. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 66(1). 42–47. 12 indexed citations

5.

Fishpool, Rita M. & Donna G. Albertson. (1992). Gene mapping with the confocal microscope. 87–93. 1 indexed citations

6.

Albertson, Donna G., Rita M. Fishpool, Paul D. Sherrington, E Nacheva, & César Milstein. (1988). Sensitive and high resolution in situ hybridization to human chromosomes using biotin labelled probes: assignment of the human thymocyte CD1 antigen genes to chromosome 1.. The EMBO Journal. 7(9). 2801–2805. 82 indexed citations

7.

Stretton, Antony O.W., et al.. (1978). Structure and physiological activity of the motoneurons of the nematode Ascaris.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 75(7). 3493–3497. 81 indexed citations

8.

MacLeod, Alexander R., R Waterston, Rita M. Fishpool, & Sydney Brenner. (1977). Identification of the structural gene for a myosin heavy-chain in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Molecular Biology. 114(1). 133–140. 98 indexed citations

9.

Waterston, R, Rita M. Fishpool, & Sydney Brenner. (1977). Mutants affecting paramyosin in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Molecular Biology. 117(3). 679–697. 92 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact