Rika Tanda

678 citations
26 papers · 525 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Rika Tanda

25 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Rika Tanda
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 287
  • Research and Theory 19
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 292
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 410
  • Pharmacy 31
Replace Gözde Gökçe İşbir with:
Gözde Gökçe İşbir Türkiye
Amy M. Romano United States
Elaine Zwelling United States
Lucie Warren United Kingdom
Dılek Coşkuner Potur Türkiye
Songül Aktaş Türkiye
Tricia Murphy‐Black United Kingdom
Wendy-Lynne Wolman South Africa
Merlinda Aluş Tokat Türkiye
Jeni Stevens Australia
Rika Tanda relative to Gözde Gökçe İşbir Türkiye Gözde Gökçe İşbir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Gözde Gökçe İşbir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rika Tanda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rika Tanda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rika Tanda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rika Tanda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rika Tanda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rika Tanda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rika Tanda. The network helps show where Rika Tanda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Rika Tanda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rika Tanda Line = papers co-authored together Rika Tanda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201292
2 199954
3 199943
4 199840
5 200130
6 200127
7 201325
8 200925
9 199823
10 200020
11 199920
12 201418
13 200317
14 200115
15 201812
16 199911
17 200010
18 20119
19 20118
20 20177

About Rika Tanda

Rika Tanda is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacy and Physiology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (15 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (12 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (287 citations), Research and Theory (19 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (292 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (410 citations) and Pharmacy (31 citations). Rika Tanda has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cuba and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Pamela J. Salsberry, A. Velazco, Carlos Sánchez, L. Varela, Patricia B. Reagan, J. L. L. Carbonell, Evelio Cabezas, Sharon A. Denham, F. Carrión Valero and Jill L. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, Contraception, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Maternal and Child Health Journal and Journal of Pediatric Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact