Marco Innamorati

10.5k citations
235 papers · 7.8k indexed · h-index 50

Marco Innamorati

228 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

Marco Innamorati
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Biological Psychiatry 590
  • Clinical Psychology 4.5k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.6k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 376
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 962
Replace Marjan Drukker with:
Marjan Drukker Netherlands
Jaana Suvisaari Finland
Mary V. Seeman Canada
Søren Dinesen Østergaard Denmark
Carlo Faravelli Italy
Heimo Viinamäki Finland
Marie‐Paule Austin Australia
Laura Helena Andrade Brazil
Hildegard Pfister Germany
Vladeta Ajdacic‐Gross Switzerland
Marco Innamorati relative to Marjan Drukker Netherlands Marjan Drukker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Marjan Drukker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marco Innamorati

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Innamorati's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Innamorati with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Innamorati more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Innamorati

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Innamorati. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Innamorati. The network helps show where Marco Innamorati may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marco Innamorati, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marco Innamorati Line = papers co-authored together Marco Innamorati links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20243
3 20241
4 20241
5 20240
6 20239
7 20232
8 202221
9 202227
10 20221
11 202117
12 202010
13 20209
14 201925
15 201910
16 201115
17
Suicide prevention among youths. Systematic review of available evidence-based interventions and implications for Italy.
201012
18
[Patients with mood disorders admitted for a suicide attempt to an emergency ward].
20104
19 2009130
20
The burn out syndrome: comparation between an emergency unit versus a general surgery department
19993

About Marco Innamorati

Marco Innamorati is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 235 papers that have together received 7.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (100 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (44 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (39 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (34 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (29 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (29 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (26 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (590 citations), Clinical Psychology (4.5k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (2.6k citations). Marco Innamorati has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Pompili, David Lester, Mario Amore, Gianluca Serafini, Paolo Girardi, Roberto Tatarelli, Paolo Girardi, Denise Erbuto, Leo Sher and Claudio Imperatori. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026