Richard S. Pope
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Reproductive Medicine
- Co-authors
- R. L. ButcherEdwin D. MurphyE. K. InskeepWilliam T. WestJerris R. HedgesDaniel LoweRajesh V. ThakkerA. A. J. Pannett
- Topics
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers)Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers)Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismJournal of Applied Physiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard S. Pope
17 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Genetics 42
- Molecular Biology 36
- Agronomy and Crop Science 35
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 24
- Reproductive Medicine 23
Countries citing papers authored by Richard S. Pope
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard S. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard S. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard S. Pope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard S. Pope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard S. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard S. Pope. The network helps show where Richard S. Pope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard S. Pope
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard S. Pope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard S. Pope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard S. Pope. Richard S. Pope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Multidisciplinary care for osteoporosis: what the primary care physician needs to know. | 2 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | One Day/One Trial or a One Week Term of Jury Service: The Misleading Marketing of Modern Jury Management Systems | 1 |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 11 |
About Richard S. Pope
Richard S. Pope is a scholar working on Aging, Nephrology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (35 citations), Aging (6 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (23 citations). Richard S. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R. L. Butcher, Edwin D. Murphy, E. K. Inskeep, William T. West, Jerris R. Hedges, Daniel Lowe, Rajesh V. Thakker, A. A. J. Pannett, Simon Forbes and Andrew T. Hattersley. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.