Richard S. Baker
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mohsen BazarganKenneth E. ClarkJosé Luis Pontijas CalderónUwe LangShahrzad BazarganShahrzad Bazargan‐HejaziAlison BrownKeith C. Norris
- Topics
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBrazil
In The Last Decade
Richard S. Baker
111 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Ophthalmology 537
- General Health Professions 488
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 468
- Epidemiology 411
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 357
Countries citing papers authored by Richard S. Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard S. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard S. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard S. Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard S. Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard S. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard S. Baker. The network helps show where Richard S. Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard S. Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard S. Baker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard S. Baker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard S. Baker. Richard S. Baker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | A FRAMEWORK FOR STUDENTS TO VISUALISE THE IMPLICATIONS OF DESIGN DECISIONS IN GLOBAL SUPPLY NETWORKS | 2 |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | Investigating organisational culture in primary care | 8 |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 81 | |
| 13 | Renewing professionalism: the next challenge for clinical governance? | 2 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About Richard S. Baker
Richard S. Baker is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Health Information Management, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (537 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (290 citations) and General Health Professions (488 citations). Richard S. Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mohsen Bazargan, Kenneth E. Clark, José Luis Pontijas Calderón, Uwe Lang, Shahrzad Bazargan, Shahrzad Bazargan‐Hejazi, Alison Brown, Keith C. Norris, Sheba George and Muhammad Shoaib Farooq. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.