Frederick Wooten

1.3k total citations
8 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

Frederick Wooten is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick Wooten has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 4 papers in Neurology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Frederick Wooten's work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers). Frederick Wooten is often cited by papers focused on Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers). Frederick Wooten collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Czechia. Frederick Wooten's co-authors include M. Roy Wilson, Joseph Jankovic, Paola Sandroni, Matthew B. Stern, Clifford W. Shults, Frederick J. Marshall, Sid Gilman, Phillip A. Low, Stephen G. Reich and Péter Novák and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet Neurology, Psychosomatic Medicine and Movement Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Frederick Wooten

8 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Frederick Wooten United States	6	251	153	70	65	50	8	368
A Voll Canada	7	195 0.8×	68 0.4×	35 0.5×	19 0.3×	28 0.6×	11	392
Elbert H. Magoon United States	13	316 1.3×	49 0.3×	88 1.3×	52 0.8×	27 0.5×	16	521
Tommy Bosman Belgium	8	163 0.6×	88 0.6×	15 0.2×	102 1.6×	40 0.8×	11	351
João Lemos Portugal	12	261 1.0×	52 0.3×	72 1.0×	129 2.0×	55 1.1×	41	443
J W Howe United Kingdom	11	81 0.3×	62 0.4×	155 2.2×	23 0.4×	161 3.2×	22	429
G. Defer France	8	261 1.0×	101 0.7×	14 0.2×	42 0.6×	37 0.7×	20	377
Brice Laurens France	9	192 0.8×	93 0.6×	20 0.3×	73 1.1×	49 1.0×	13	297
Andrew J. Gay United States	12	180 0.7×	29 0.2×	154 2.2×	49 0.8×	50 1.0×	24	426
Yukihisa Suzuki Japan	12	200 0.8×	74 0.5×	158 2.3×	38 0.6×	48 1.0×	39	452
John B. Oldershaw United States	8	226 0.9×	97 0.6×	11 0.2×	36 0.6×	45 0.9×	10	379

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Wooten

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Wooten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Wooten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Wooten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Wooten

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Wooten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Wooten. The network helps show where Frederick Wooten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Wooten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Wooten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Wooten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Wooten. Frederick Wooten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Low, Phillip A., Stephen G. Reich, Joseph Jankovic, et al.. (2015). Natural history of multiple system atrophy in the USA: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Neurology. 14(7). 710–719. 221 indexed citations

2.

Low, P. A., Stephen G. Reich, Joseph Jankovic, et al.. (2015). Natural history study of MSA in North America: A prospective cohort study. Autonomic Neuroscience. 192. 126–127. 1 indexed citations

3.

May, Susanne, Sid Gilman, Ronald G. Thomas, et al.. (2007). Potential outcome measures and trial design issues for multiple system atrophy. Movement Disorders. 22(16). 2371–2377. 45 indexed citations

4.

Wilson, M. Roy, et al.. (1991). The Effects of Topical Mitomycin on Glaucoma Filtration Surgery in Rabbits. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 7(1). 1–8. 57 indexed citations

5.

Wilson, M. Roy, Frederick Wooten, & Jennifer Stewart Williams. (1991). Frequency and characteristics of ocular trauma in an urban population.. PubMed. 83(8). 697–702. 17 indexed citations

6.

Wooten, Frederick, et al.. (1980). Biochemical Properties of Spiperone Binding to Rat Brain Membranes. Pharmacology. 21(4). 295–305. 5 indexed citations

7.

Lamprecht, Friedhelm, Burr Eichelman, Redford B. Williams, Frederick Wooten, & Irwin J. Kopin. (1974). Serum Dopamine-beta-Hydroxylase (DBH) Activity and Blood Pressure Response of Rat Strains to Shock-Induced Fighting**. Psychosomatic Medicine. 36(4). 298–303. 8 indexed citations

8.

Wooten, Frederick, et al.. (1974). Proportionality between Dopamine-β-Hydroxylase Activity and Immunoreactive Protein Concentration in Human Serum. Pharmacology. 12(4-5). 272–282. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact