Richard Osborn

18 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Richard Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 140
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 98
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Genetics 33
Replace Nülüfer Erbi̇l with:
Nülüfer Erbi̇l Türkiye
Karen Murray United Kingdom
Idayu Badilla Idris Malaysia
Julie Wilson Canada
Julie Roberts United Kingdom
Mabel Lie United Kingdom
Linda J. Patrick Canada
Dilisha Patel United Kingdom
Elaine M. Drew United States
Caren Steinway United States
Richard Osborn relative to Nülüfer Erbi̇l Türkiye Nülüfer Erbi̇l's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Nülüfer Erbi̇l · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Osborn. The network helps show where Richard Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Osborn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Osborn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Osborn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Osborn. Richard Osborn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The American Computer Software Industry: Economic Development Prospects
1
2
Bias Estimation and Observability for Optical Sensor Measurements with Targets of Opportunity
9
3 106
4 59
5 15
6 5
7
Health And Family Planning In Community-based Distribution Projects
5
8
Third world family planning programs: measuring the costs.
22
9 53
10 7
11 6
12 27
13 1
14 12
15 8
16 7
17 9
18 4

About Richard Osborn

Richard Osborn is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (140 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (92 citations). Richard Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Hodnett, Robert F. Spengler, Alice Newman, C. Allan Woolever, E. Aileen Clarke, Ismail Sirageldin, David S. Salkever, Michael Micklin, Benjamin D. Singer and James A. Geschwender. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Epidemiology and Population and Development Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026