Mabel Lie

28 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Mabel Lie
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 99
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Demography 113
  • Human-Computer Interaction 28
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 80
Replace Paola Pierri with:
Paola Pierri United Kingdom
Dilisha Patel United Kingdom
Richard Osborn Canada
Karen Yates Australia
Christine Unson United States
Deborah Vollmer Dahlke United States
Hyunju Shim United States
Karine Latulippe Canada
Valerie Chan Singapore
Young Sun Kim South Korea
Mabel Lie relative to Paola Pierri United Kingdom Paola Pierri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Paola Pierri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mabel Lie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mabel Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mabel Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mabel Lie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mabel Lie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mabel Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mabel Lie. The network helps show where Mabel Lie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mabel Lie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mabel Lie Line = papers co-authored together Mabel Lie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201395
2 201344
3 201041
4 200939
5 201938
6 201527
7 200722
8 201222
9 202118
10 202010
11 20188
12 20148
13
Volunteering, self-help and citizenship in later life
20047
14 20146
15 20185
16 20185
17 20115
18
Methodological Issues in Qualitative Research with Minority Ethnic Research Participants
20064
19 20223
20 20213

About Mabel Lie

Mabel Lie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (99 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Demography (113 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (28 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (80 citations). Mabel Lie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Susan Baines, Carl May, Louise Hayes, Ruth Bell, Nick Lewis‐Barned, Martin White, Jane Wheelock, Katie Brittain, Stephen Lindsay and Stephen C. Robson. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Women s Studies International Forum, European Journal of Public Health, Ageing and Society and Sociology of Health & Illness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact