Mabel Lie

618 total citations
33 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

Mabel Lie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mabel Lie has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Mabel Lie's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers). Mabel Lie is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers). Mabel Lie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Mabel Lie's co-authors include Susan Baines, Carl May, Martin White, Nick Lewis‐Barned, Louise Hayes, Ruth Bell, Jane Wheelock, Stephen Lindsay, Katie Brittain and Stephen C. Robson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Health Technology Assessment and Diabetic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mabel Lie

28 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mabel Lie United Kingdom 10 116 113 99 92 80 33 426
Dilisha Patel United Kingdom 8 54 0.5× 17 0.2× 237 2.4× 164 1.8× 289 3.6× 23 639
Meghan Bradway Norway 12 69 0.6× 37 0.3× 8 0.1× 348 3.8× 14 0.2× 31 524
Richard Osborn Canada 9 32 0.3× 19 0.2× 140 1.4× 68 0.7× 92 1.1× 18 356
Karen Yates Australia 12 62 0.5× 5 0.0× 34 0.3× 95 1.0× 46 0.6× 28 438
Deborah Vollmer Dahlke United States 10 96 0.8× 56 0.5× 3 0.0× 119 1.3× 193 2.4× 21 513
Ana Cláudia Garabeli Cavalli Kluthcovsky Brazil 14 45 0.4× 47 0.4× 8 0.1× 182 2.0× 40 0.5× 49 460
Paola Pierri United Kingdom 5 52 0.4× 21 0.2× 6 0.1× 194 2.1× 26 0.3× 9 428
Luca Salmasi Italy 10 73 0.6× 9 0.1× 24 0.2× 61 0.7× 36 0.5× 31 270
Christine Unson United States 14 49 0.4× 26 0.2× 6 0.1× 100 1.1× 12 0.1× 31 503
Fiona Smith United Kingdom 10 49 0.4× 13 0.1× 10 0.1× 51 0.6× 24 0.3× 43 293

Countries citing papers authored by Mabel Lie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mabel Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mabel Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mabel Lie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mabel Lie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mabel Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mabel Lie. The network helps show where Mabel Lie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mabel Lie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mabel Lie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mabel Lie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mabel Lie. Mabel Lie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lie, Mabel, et al.. (2025). Insights from ERicar: Engaging Roma women in the co-creation of an antenatal care information resource. Women s Studies International Forum. 112. 103166–103166.
2.
Allen, Francis A., Pip Logan, Janet Darby, et al.. (2025). Implementing the Action Falls Program Into Care Homes in England (the FinCH Imp Study). Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 26(12). 105940–105940.
3.
4.
Lie, Mabel, et al.. (2023). Engaging Czech-Slovak Roma women in the co-creation of an antenatal care information resource. European Journal of Public Health. 33(Supplement_2).
5.
Lie, Mabel, Catherine McParlin, Elaine McColl, Ruth Graham, & Stephen C. Robson. (2022). Emesis in pregnancy – a qualitative study on trial recruitment failure from the EMPOWER internal pilot. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 8(1). 146–146. 3 indexed citations
6.
Robson, Stephen C., Catherine McParlin, Helen Mossop, et al.. (2021). Ondansetron and metoclopramide as second-line antiemetics in women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: the EMPOWER pilot factorial RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 25(63). 1–116. 3 indexed citations
7.
Marshall, Alison, et al.. (2021). Implementation of a fetal ultrasound telemedicine service: women’s views and family costs. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 21(1). 38–38. 18 indexed citations
8.
Lie, Mabel, et al.. (2020). Service user and staff acceptance of fetal ultrasound telemedicine. Digital Health. 6. 1345280489–1345280489. 10 indexed citations
9.
Griffiths, Paul D., Mike Bradburn, Michael J. Campbell, et al.. (2019). MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technology Assessment. 23(49). 1–144. 38 indexed citations
10.
Lie, Mabel, Ruth Graham, Stephen C. Robson, & Paul Griffiths. (2018). “He looks gorgeous” – iuMR images and the transforming of foetal and parental identities. Sociology of Health & Illness. 41(2). 360–377. 5 indexed citations
11.
Lie, Mabel, Ruth Graham, Stephen C. Robson, & Paul D. Griffiths. (2018). MRI for Fetal Developmental Brain Abnormalities: Perspectives From the Pregnant Patient. Qualitative Health Research. 28(8). 1295–1307. 8 indexed citations
12.
Lie, Mabel, Jan Lecouturier, & Chris Harding. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? A qualitative study exploring participation in a urology clinical trial. International Urogynecology Journal. 30(1). 9–16. 5 indexed citations
13.
Lie, Mabel, et al.. (2017). The introduction of a fetal ultrasound telemedicine service: quality outcomes and family costs. Insight (University of Cumbria). 2 indexed citations
14.
Lie, Mabel, Stephen Lindsay, & Katie Brittain. (2015). Technology and trust: older people's perspectives of a home monitoring system. Ageing and Society. 36(7). 1501–1525. 27 indexed citations
15.
Lie, Mabel, Madeleine J. Murtagh, Duika Burges Watson, et al.. (2014). Risk communication in the hyperacute setting of stroke thrombolysis: an interview study of clinicians. Emergency Medicine Journal. 32(5). 357–363. 6 indexed citations
16.
Murtagh, Madeleine J., Duika Burges Watson, K. Neil Jenkings, et al.. (2012). Situationally-Sensitive Knowledge Translation and Relational Decision Making in Hyperacute Stroke: A Qualitative Study. PLoS ONE. 7(6). e37066–e37066. 22 indexed citations
17.
Lie, Mabel, et al.. (2011). Preventing type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: qualitative studies with postnatal women to inform intervention development. Annals of Human Biology.
18.
Lie, Mabel, et al.. (2011). ‘Let the computer choose?’: the experience of participants in a randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy. Sociology of Health & Illness. 34(5). 746–760. 5 indexed citations
19.
Lie, Mabel. (2010). Across the Oceans: Childcare and Grandparenting in UK Chinese and Bangladeshi Households. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 36(9). 1425–1443. 41 indexed citations
20.
Lie, Mabel & Susan Baines. (2007). Making Sense of Organizational Change: Voices of Older Volunteers. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 18(3). 225–240. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dilisha Patel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Meghan Bradway Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard Osborn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen Yates Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah Vollmer Dahlke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana Cláudia Garabeli Cavalli Kluthcovsky Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paola Pierri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luca Salmasi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Unson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fiona Smith
Rankless by CCL
2026