Richard Olson

807 citations
30 papers · 339 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Olson

26 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Richard Olson
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • History and Philosophy of Science 85
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 67
  • Family Practice 11
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
  • General Psychology 4
Replace Nicolaus Copernicus with:
Nicolaus Copernicus
Arthur Donovan United States
Gad Freudenthal France
Larry Stewart Canada
Olaf Pedersen Denmark
Éric Brian France
Dhruv Raina India
Francis T. Fallon United States
Thomas Holden United States
Lissa Roberts Netherlands
Richard Olson relative to Nicolaus Copernicus Nicolaus Copernicus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nicolaus Copernicus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Olson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Olson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Olson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Olson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Olson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Olson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Olson. The network helps show where Richard Olson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Richard Olson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Olson Line = papers co-authored together Richard Olson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977109
2 198962
3 199427
4 197720
5 197115
6 201114
7 198113
8 19779
9 20019
10 19809
11 19748
12 19777
13 20046
14 19956
15 19984
16 19763
17 19853
18 19693
19 19782
20 19702

About Richard Olson

Richard Olson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Nuclear Materials and Properties (1 paper), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (85 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (67 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and General Psychology (4 citations). Richard Olson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Ziman, David Lindenfeld, G. P. Henderson, J. L. Heilbron, Arthur Donovan, P Landsberg, A. Mark Smith, Phillip Drennon Thomas, John Hedley Brooke and Barbara Maria Stafford. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Annals of Science, History of Science, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and History of the Human Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact