Richard M. Emerson

17 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Power-Dependence Relations196220261983200419621978198310002.0k3.0k4.0k

Peers

Richard M. Emerson
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.5k
  • Strategy and Management 2.0k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.8k
  • Management Information Systems 788
  • Social Psychology 764
Replace H. Joseph Reitz with:
H. Joseph Reitz United States
Warren G. Bennis United States
Edward J. Lawler United States
Samuel B. Bacharach United States
Eliot R. Hammer United States
Harrison M. Trice United States
Joseph F. Porac United States
Meryl Reis Louis United States
John W. Slocum United States
David J. Hickson United Kingdom
Richard M. Emerson relative to H. Joseph Reitz United States H. Joseph Reitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
H. Joseph Reitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Emerson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Emerson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Emerson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Emerson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Emerson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Emerson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Emerson. The network helps show where Richard M. Emerson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Emerson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Emerson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Emerson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Emerson. Richard M. Emerson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 13
2 4
3 11
4 14
5
The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Resultsbreakdown →
590
6
Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networksbreakdown →
1150
7 0
8 17
9 54
10 2
11 12
12 117
13 27
14 11
15
Power-Dependence Relationsbreakdown →
4306
16 19
17
Some methods for the study of family interaction in personality development.
5
18 47

About Richard M. Emerson

Richard M. Emerson is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Power and Status Dynamics (3 papers), Social Capital and Networks (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.8k citations), Strategy and Management (2.0k citations) and Management Information Systems (788 citations). Richard M. Emerson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Karen S. Cook, Toshio Yamagishi, Mary Rogers Gillmore, Timothy J. Curry, James L. Titchener, M. Brewster Smith, Jules Riskin, F Kapp, Goldine C. Gleser and Charles B. Corbin. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026