Richard Lee
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Physiology
- Clinical Psychology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Kim J. BurchielLisa C. RussellAnders A. F. SimaLouise RobinsonTim RapleyClaire BamfordPhilip LoweCatherine Exley
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Geriatrics and GerontologyGeneral Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard Lee
35 papers receiving 606 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 163
- General Health Professions 154
- Physiology 117
- Clinical Psychology 83
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 71
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Lee
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Lee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Lee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Lee. The network helps show where Richard Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Lee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Lee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Lee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Lee. Richard Lee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 59 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Richard Lee
Richard Lee is a scholar working on Family Practice, Occupational Therapy and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 36 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (29 citations), General Health Professions (154 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (163 citations). Richard Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kim J. Burchiel, Lisa C. Russell, Anders A. F. Sima, Louise Robinson, Tim Rapley, Claire Bamford, Philip Lowe, Catherine Exley, Ruth I. Hart and Jeremy Phillipson. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, PLoS ONE and Diabetes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.