Richard Laver
- Geometry and Topology top 0.5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Mathematical Physics top 2%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics top 5%
- Co-authors
- James E. BaumgartnerSaharon ShelahGeorge F. McNultyMatthew ForemanKrzysztof CiesielskiD. R. JacksonRalph McKenzieVance Faber
- Topics
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory (19 papers)Rings, Modules, and Algebras (7 papers)Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of MathematicsTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietyAdvances in Mathematics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Richard Laver
35 papers receiving 775 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Geometry and Topology 761
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 584
- Mathematical Physics 389
- Algebra and Number Theory 184
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 119
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Laver
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Laver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Laver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Laver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Laver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Laver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Laver. The network helps show where Richard Laver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Laver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Laver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Laver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Laver. Richard Laver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Assessing the Business Case for Integrated Collision Avoidance Systems on Transit Buses | 5 |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 90 | |
| 17 | A saturation property on ideals | 2 |
| 18 | 203 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 88 |
About Richard Laver
Richard Laver is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (19 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (7 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (761 citations), Mathematical Physics (389 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (184 citations). Richard Laver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include James E. Baumgartner, Saharon Shelah, George F. McNulty, Matthew Foreman, Krzysztof Ciesielski, D. R. Jackson, Ralph McKenzie, Vance Faber, Michael O’Connor and Ali Touran. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Advances in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.