Richard Laver
- Geometry and Topology top 0.5%
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory 19
- Geometric and Algebraic Topology 5
- Mathematical Physics top 2%
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 7
- Advanced Operator Algebra Research 4
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Rings, Modules, and Algebras 7
-
- Limits and Structures in Graph Theory 4
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 7
-
- Transportation Planning and Optimization 5
- Co-authors
- James E. BaumgartnerSaharon ShelahGeorge F. McNultyMatthew ForemanKrzysztof CiesielskiD. R. JacksonRalph McKenzieVance Faber
- Journals
- Annals of Mathematics (2 papers)Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (2 papers)Advances in Mathematics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Richard Laver
35 papers receiving 775 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Geometry and Topology 761
- Mathematical Physics 389
- Algebra and Number Theory 184
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 119
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 584
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Laver
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Laver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Laver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Laver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Laver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Laver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Laver. The network helps show where Richard Laver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Richard Laver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 2 | Assessing the Business Case for Integrated Collision Avoidance Systems on Transit Buses | 2007 | 5 |
| 3 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 49 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 90 | |
| 17 | A saturation property on ideals | 1978 | 2 |
| 18 | 1978 | 203 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 88 |
About Richard Laver
Richard Laver is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (19 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (7 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (7 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (5 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (5 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (4 papers) and Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (761 citations), Mathematical Physics (389 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (184 citations). Richard Laver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include James E. Baumgartner, Saharon Shelah, George F. McNulty, Matthew Foreman, Krzysztof Ciesielski, D. R. Jackson, Ralph McKenzie, Vance Faber, Michael O’Connor and Ali Touran. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Advances in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.