Richard K. Peach

913 total citations
41 papers, 653 citations indexed

About

Richard K. Peach is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard K. Peach has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 653 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 9 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Richard K. Peach's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (31 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (7 papers). Richard K. Peach is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (31 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (7 papers). Richard K. Peach collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Richard K. Peach's co-authors include Charles Ellis, Margaret Walshe, Nick Miller, Lewis P. Shapiro, Patrick C. M. Wong, Marilyn Newhoff, Edythe A. Strand, Joseph R. Duffy, Rose Y. Hardy and Richard C. Lindrooth and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuropsychologia, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Richard K. Peach

41 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard K. Peach United States 16 473 205 119 91 85 41 653
Shannon C. Mauszycki United States 16 492 1.0× 316 1.5× 27 0.2× 163 1.8× 41 0.5× 35 685
Jean Neils‐Strunjas United States 11 228 0.5× 76 0.4× 67 0.6× 45 0.5× 29 0.3× 36 489
Catharine Pettigrew Australia 10 296 0.6× 74 0.4× 40 0.3× 30 0.3× 92 1.1× 13 546
Janet P. Patterson United States 12 506 1.1× 194 0.9× 89 0.7× 17 0.2× 55 0.6× 23 695
Michael de Riesthal United States 11 257 0.5× 107 0.5× 48 0.4× 39 0.4× 36 0.4× 29 394
Gail Ramsberger United States 14 540 1.1× 252 1.2× 29 0.2× 20 0.2× 49 0.6× 25 690
Floris Singletary United States 10 285 0.6× 142 0.7× 42 0.4× 60 0.7× 14 0.2× 13 436
Roberta Chapey United States 6 793 1.7× 329 1.6× 70 0.6× 29 0.3× 187 2.2× 15 973
Lauryn Zipse United States 10 640 1.4× 149 0.7× 48 0.4× 33 0.4× 11 0.1× 21 770
Anna Volkmer United Kingdom 15 533 1.1× 126 0.6× 16 0.1× 68 0.7× 242 2.8× 53 746

Countries citing papers authored by Richard K. Peach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard K. Peach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard K. Peach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard K. Peach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard K. Peach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard K. Peach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard K. Peach. The network helps show where Richard K. Peach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard K. Peach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard K. Peach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard K. Peach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard K. Peach. Richard K. Peach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peach, Richard K., et al.. (2021). Sentence-level processing predicts narrative coherence following traumatic brain injury: evidence in support of a resource model of discourse processing. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 36(6). 694–710. 8 indexed citations
2.
Peach, Richard K., et al.. (2019). Language-specific attention treatment for aphasia (Peach et al., 2019). Figshare. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hardy, Rose Y., Richard C. Lindrooth, Richard K. Peach, & Charles Ellis. (2018). Urban-Rural Differences in Service Utilization and Costs of Care for Racial-Ethnic Groups Hospitalized With Poststroke Aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 100(2). 254–260. 13 indexed citations
4.
Ellis, Charles, Rose Y. Hardy, Richard C. Lindrooth, & Richard K. Peach. (2017). Rate of aphasia among stroke patients discharged from hospitals in the United States. Aphasiology. 32(9). 1075–1086. 29 indexed citations
5.
Ellis, Charles & Richard K. Peach. (2016). Life satisfaction and aphasia: an integrative review with recommendations for future research. Aphasiology. 31(6). 631–642. 9 indexed citations
6.
Ellis, Charles & Richard K. Peach. (2016). Racial-Ethnic Differences in Word Fluency and Auditory Comprehension Among Persons With Poststroke Aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 98(4). 681–686. 23 indexed citations
8.
Ellis, Charles & Richard K. Peach. (2009). Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation. 24(3). 255–266. 25 indexed citations
9.
Peach, Richard K., et al.. (2008). Semantic feature analysis for word retrieval failures in aphasic discourse production. The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh). 1 indexed citations
10.
Walshe, Margaret, Richard K. Peach, & Nick Miller. (2008). Dysarthria Impact Profile: development of a scale to measure psychosocial effects. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 44(5). 693–715. 90 indexed citations
11.
Duffy, Joseph R., Richard K. Peach, & Edythe A. Strand. (2007). Progressive Apraxia of Speech as a Sign of Motor Neuron Disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 16(3). 198–208. 42 indexed citations
12.
Peach, Richard K.. (2004). Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Features, Accounts, and Treatment. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 11(1). 49–58. 13 indexed citations
13.
Peach, Richard K. & Patrick C. M. Wong. (2004). Integrating the message level into treatment for agrammatism using story retelling. Aphasiology. 18(5-7). 429–441. 33 indexed citations
14.
Peach, Richard K., et al.. (2003). Phonemic characteristics of apraxia of speech resulting from subcortical hemorrhage. Journal of Communication Disorders. 37(1). 77–90. 24 indexed citations
15.
Peach, Richard K.. (2002). Treatment for phonological dyslexia targeting regularity effects. Aphasiology. 16(8). 779–789. 5 indexed citations
16.
Peach, Richard K.. (2001). Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 10(1). 29–36. 7 indexed citations
17.
Wang, Emily, et al.. (2000). Perception of Dynamic Acoustic Patterns by an Individual with Unilateral Verbal Auditory Agnosia. Brain and Language. 73(3). 442–455. 22 indexed citations
18.
Peach, Richard K.. (1996). Treatment for Aphasic Phonological Output Planning Deficits. Heliyon. 10(20). e39146–e39146. 1 indexed citations
19.
Peach, Richard K.. (1988). Comprehension of sentence structure in anomic and conduction aphasia*1. Brain and Language. 35(1). 119–137. 15 indexed citations
20.
Peach, Richard K., et al.. (1983). Subcortical aphasia: A report of three cases. The Aphasiology Archive (University of Pittsburgh). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026