Richard G. Smith

36 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

A roster of world cities19992026200820171999100200300400500

Peers

Richard G. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Urban Studies 1.0k
  • Economics and Econometrics 563
  • Political Science and International Relations 323
  • Sociology and Political Science 307
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 110
Replace Peter Geoffrey Hall with:
Peter Geoffrey Hall United Kingdom
William J. Coffey Canada
Gert‐Jan Hospers Netherlands
John Harrison United Kingdom
W.F. Lever United Kingdom
Robert Freestone Australia
James O. Wheeler United States
Paul C. Cheshire United Kingdom
Klaus R. Kunzmann Germany
Peter J. Rimmer Australia
Richard G. Smith relative to Peter Geoffrey Hall United Kingdom Peter Geoffrey Hall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter Geoffrey Hall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Smith. The network helps show where Richard G. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Smith. Richard G. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 4
4
Introduction to Geographic Information Science using ArcGIS V10
1
5 44
6 23
7 2
8 40
9
Ancient Tales and Folk-lore of Japan
0
10 4
11
Service Industries and Asia-Pacific Cities: New development trajectories
11
12 4
13 3
14 11
15 332
16 43
17 101
18 13
19
Bombarding the senses: Adolescents' use of information technology in Australia and Scotland
2
20
The Japan diaries of Richard Gordon Smith
1

About Richard G. Smith

Richard G. Smith is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Urban Networks and Dynamics (14 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (11 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (1.0k citations), Economics and Econometrics (563 citations) and Transportation (109 citations). Richard G. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan V. Beaverstock, PJ Taylor, Peter J. Taylor, Marcus A. Doel, In‐Ju Kim, Hayden Lorimer, David Clarke, Mark Sinclair, Jim Mienczakowski and John R. Rohde. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Studies, Progress in Human Geography and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026