Richard Flint
- Surgery
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- William J. McBrideM.A. ReaJohn A. WindsorJames M. MurphyM.J.D. BonhamRobert LopezLinda CardozoBryan R. Parry
- Topics
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (9 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Flint
30 papers receiving 342 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Surgery 178
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 98
- Oncology 72
- Molecular Biology 57
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 33
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Flint
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Flint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Flint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Flint more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Flint
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Flint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Flint. The network helps show where Richard Flint may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Flint
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Flint. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Flint based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Flint. Richard Flint is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | Intramural oesophageal haematoma-a rare complication of dabigatran. | 4 |
| 7 | A comparison of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single surgeon's experience. | 3 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands and the effect of living in distant towns. | 7 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Richard Flint
Richard Flint is a scholar working on Microbiology, Surgery and Urology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations), Surgery (178 citations) and Urology (21 citations). Richard Flint has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William J. McBride, M.A. Rea, John A. Windsor, James M. Murphy, M.J.D. Bonham, Robert Lopez, Linda Cardozo, Bryan R. Parry, Matthew A. Clark and Angie Rantell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Life Sciences and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.