Richard D. Bourgin

534 citations
15 papers · 346 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Richard D. Bourgin

12 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Richard D. Bourgin
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Mathematical Physics 237
  • Applied Mathematics 177
  • Algebra and Number Theory 64
  • Geometry and Topology 79
  • Statistics and Probability 58
Replace Ryōtarō Satō with:
Ryōtarō Satō Japan
P. H. Maserick United States
T. T. West Ireland
Yasuji Takahashi Japan
Zbigniew Semadeni Poland
Mary R. Embry United States
Morisuke Hasumi Japan
Bertram M. Schreiber United States
Bruce Barnes United States
Nicolae Dinculeanu United States
Richard D. Bourgin relative to Ryōtarō Satō Japan Ryōtarō Satō's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ryōtarō Satō · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard D. Bourgin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard D. Bourgin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard D. Bourgin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard D. Bourgin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard D. Bourgin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard D. Bourgin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard D. Bourgin. The network helps show where Richard D. Bourgin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Richard D. Bourgin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard D. Bourgin Line = papers co-authored together Richard D. Bourgin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1983201
2 197340
3 197530
4 197923
5 197510
6 197610
7 19899
8 19717
9 19817
10 19714
11 19932
12 19811
13 20081
14 19781
15 19940

About Richard D. Bourgin

Richard D. Bourgin is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Banach Space Theory (8 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (3 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (3 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (3 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (2 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (2 papers) and Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (237 citations), Applied Mathematics (177 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (64 citations), Geometry and Topology (79 citations) and Statistics and Probability (58 citations). Richard D. Bourgin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald A. Edgar, Robert Cogburn and Sally E. Howe. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Advances in Applied Probability, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Advances in Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact