Richard Cathcart
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Nephrology top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- B N AmesPaul HochsteinBruce N. AmesRobert L. SaulWilliam FraimowDickinson W. RichardsDavid A. GoldthwaitAndré Cournand
- Topics
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers)Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesCirculationJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Richard Cathcart
27 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Nephrology 1.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 488
- Physiology 447
- Surgery 380
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Cathcart
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Cathcart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Cathcart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Cathcart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Cathcart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Cathcart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Cathcart. The network helps show where Richard Cathcart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Cathcart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Cathcart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Cathcart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Cathcart. Richard Cathcart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The last quitters: nobody's science and physics | 0 |
| 2 | 88 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 298 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 69 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Richard Cathcart
Richard Cathcart is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Bioengineering and Nephrology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (1.1k citations), Biochemistry (249 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (488 citations). Richard Cathcart has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include B N Ames, Paul Hochstein, Bruce N. Ames, Robert L. Saul, William Fraimow, Dickinson W. Richards, David A. Goldthwait, André Cournand, M. IRENÉ FERRER and J. William Efcavitch. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Circulation and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.