Richard C. Dennis
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. R. ValeriHerbert B. HechtmanRichard D. WeiselLouis VitoErwin F. HirschMarisa A. MontecalvoKathleen A. StegerDonald E. Craven
- Topics
- Blood transfusion and management (6 papers)Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers)Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Richard C. Dennis
21 papers receiving 834 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Surgery 293
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 237
- Nutrition and Dietetics 231
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 193
- Physiology 190
Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Dennis
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Dennis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Dennis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Dennis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Dennis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Dennis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Dennis. The network helps show where Richard C. Dennis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Dennis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Dennis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Dennis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Dennis. Richard C. Dennis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 40 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 292 | |
| 7 | 81 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 125 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Richard C. Dennis
Richard C. Dennis is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 898 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers) and Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (193 citations), Emergency Medicine (153 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (231 citations). Richard C. Dennis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include C. R. Valeri, Herbert B. Hechtman, Richard D. Weisel, Louis Vito, Erwin F. Hirsch, Marisa A. Montecalvo, Kathleen A. Steger, Donald E. Craven, Harrison W. Farber and Desmond H. Birkett. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, CHEST Journal and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.